» Articles » PMID: 22002969

Conceptualizing and Measuring Intergenerational Ambivalence in Later Life

Overview
Date 2011 Oct 18
PMID 22002969
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: In this paper, we explored the association between direct and indirect measures of intergenerational ambivalence, making comparisons by generational position and child's gender; furthermore, we examined whether these measures were similarly strong predictors of depressive symptoms and positive affect.

Methods: Data for the analysis were collected from 254 mothers aged 72-82 years and a randomly selected adult child as part of a larger study of within-family differences in parent-adult child relations.

Results: The findings provided evidence that direct and indirect measures were strongly associated among mothers but only weakly associated among adult children, particularly sons. The two measures were similarly strong predictors of mothers', but not children's, depressive symptoms and positive affect. The most pronounced differences in congruence between direct and indirect measures were found when comparing mothers and sons.

Discussion: The analyses presented here suggest that direct and indirect measures of intergenerational ambivalence may not be tapping the same underlying construct, particularly in the case of adult children and especially sons. Furthermore, direct measures may have an advantage over indirect measures when including sons in the study design. We conclude that direct and indirect measures cannot be used interchangeably across the combination of generation and gender.

Citing Articles

A Decade of Research on Intergenerational Ties: Technological, Economic, Political, and Demographic Changes.

Fingerman K, Huo M, Birditt K J Marriage Fam. 2024; 82(1):383-403.

PMID: 38831801 PMC: 11145410. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12604.


Recent Parental Death and Relationship Qualities Between Midlife Adults and Their Grown Children.

Kim Y, Kim K, Boerner K, Birditt K, Zarit S, Fingerman K J Marriage Fam. 2024; 81(3):616-630.

PMID: 38463137 PMC: 10923572. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12549.


How Grandparents Inform Our Lives: A Mixed Methods Investigation of Intergenerational Influence on Young Adults.

Stephan A J Adult Dev. 2023; :1-13.

PMID: 37361382 PMC: 10026795. DOI: 10.1007/s10804-023-09446-7.


Intergenerational Transmission of Relationship Quality in Later-Life Families.

Hou Y, Suitor J, Gilligan M J Marriage Fam. 2023; 85(2):539-555.

PMID: 36936541 PMC: 10022701. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12884.


Intergenerational Ambivalence and Loneliness in Later Life.

Hua C, Brown J, Bulanda J J Marriage Fam. 2021; 83(1):75-85.

PMID: 34538929 PMC: 8448254. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12716.


References
1.
Graham J . Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008; 60:549-76. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530. View

2.
Silverstein M, Giarrusso R . Aging and Family Life: A Decade Review. J Marriage Fam. 2012; 72(5):1039-1058. PMC: 3427733. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00749.x. View

3.
Fingerman K, Chen P, Hay E, Cichy K, Lefkowitz E . Ambivalent reactions in the parent and offspring relationship. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006; 61(3):P152-60. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/61.3.p152. View

4.
Reynolds P, Hurley S, Torres M, Jackson J, Boyd P, Chen V . Use of coping strategies and breast cancer survival: results from the Black/White Cancer Survival Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 152(10):940-9. DOI: 10.1093/aje/152.10.940. View

5.
Petty R, Tormala Z, Brinol P, Jarvis W . Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: an exploration of the PAST model. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006; 90(1):21-41. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.21. View