» Articles » PMID: 21988044

Post-operative Peritonitis Due to Anastomotic Dehiscence After Colonic Resection. Multicentric Experience, Retrospective Analysis of Risk Factors and Review of the Literature

Overview
Journal Ann Ital Chir
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2011 Oct 13
PMID 21988044
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Intraperitoneal sepsis due to anastomotic leakage significantly affects the outcomes of intestinal surgery. The aim of this retrospective review is to examine retrospectively general and local factors involved in anastomotic leakage and their prognostic value.

Materials And Methods: Between April 1998 and April 2008, 367 patients underwent elective (217=59%) or emergency (150=41%) primary colonic resection for benignan (77=21%) or malignant (290=79%) disease in our department. We performed the following operations; 124 right colon resections with immediate anastomoses (primary resection), 65 (52.4%) of which were emergency and 59 (47.6%) elective procedures; 171 left colon resections, 73 (42.7%) of which were emergency and 98 (57.3%) elective procedures, and 72 primary rectal resections, 12 (16.7%) of which were emergency and 60 (83.3%) elective procedures. The considered variables were stapled or manual anastomoses, protective stomas and medical comorbidities.

Results: The perioperative mortality rate was 6.6% for emergency and 3.6% for elective procedures. The leak rate was 8.7% (32/367), 13.3% for emergency and 5.5% for elective procedures. Fistula was observed in 7/124 (5.6%) ileocolic, 13/171 (7.6%) colo-colic and 12/72 (16.6%) colo-rectal anastomoses, 8 of which were fashioned during emergency surgery. Twenty-one patients with anastomotic dehiscence were treated conservatively (3 underwent reoperation), while 11, with severe dehiscence, in all cases in the left colon, underwent an emergency Hartmann's procedure, with a perioperative mortality rate of 35.7%.

Conclusions: In our experience, the site of colonic anastomosis represents the risk factor most strictly related to the anastomotic leak rate, while other technical factors seem weakly associated with leakage. A significantly high percentage of patients (65.6%) with anastomotic fistulas have medical comorbidities.

Citing Articles

The evaluation of risk factors in fascia dehiscence after abdominal surgeries.

Parsa H, Haji Maghsoudi L, Mohammadzadeh A, Hosseini M Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024; 86(9):4984-4989.

PMID: 39239048 PMC: 11374210. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002335.


Isoperistaltic antiperistaltic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy: A comprehensive review.

Symeonidis D, Karakantas K, Kissa L, Samara A, Bompou E, Tepetes K World J Clin Cases. 2023; 11(8):1694-1701.

PMID: 36970003 PMC: 10037296. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i8.1694.


A novel nomogram for anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer: a retrospective study.

Li T, Huang J, Lei P, Yang X, Chen Z, Chen P PeerJ. 2022; 10:e14437.

PMID: 36518266 PMC: 9744139. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14437.


Analysis of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer and Construction of a Nomogram Prediction Model.

Wang K, Li M, Liu R, Ji Y, Yan J Cancer Manag Res. 2022; 14:2243-2252.

PMID: 35928989 PMC: 9343466. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S364875.


Safety of anastomotic techniques and consequences of anastomotic leakage in patients with colorectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.

Elthes E, Sala D, Neagoe R, Sardi K, Szekely J Med Pharm Rep. 2020; 93(4):384-389.

PMID: 33225264 PMC: 7664733. DOI: 10.15386/mpr-1648.