» Articles » PMID: 21984227

Slovenian Pharmacy Performance: a Patient-centred Approach to Patient Satisfaction Survey Content Development

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialties Pharmacology
Pharmacy
Date 2011 Oct 11
PMID 21984227
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To identify content of pharmacy performance relevant to patient satisfaction.

Setting: Interviews with pharmacy users were conducted at their homes. The Delphi meeting was run at the Faculty of Pharmacy, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Method: A two-phase process was employed. In Phase I, interviews with 43 pharmacy users were conducted to identify patients' experiences and expectations relating to pharmacies. The content analysis of their responses resulted in a list of themes from which items were generated. In Phase II, a 10 member expert panel was employed in a two round Delphi technique to rate the importance of each item for the patient satisfaction.

Main Outcome Measure: Themes derived from the interviews and their importance for patient satisfaction as assessed by the expert panel.

Results: Seventy-nine themes were generated from the survey responses which were grouped into four main categories: 'Relations', 'Counseling', 'Physical facilities and location' and 'Process'. In total, 69 items were generated. The expert panel rated 84% of generated items as very or somewhat important.

Conclusion: The qualitative study provides insights on the content of pharmacy performance relevant to patients. Identified categories encompass a wide range of issues that contribute to patient satisfaction with pharmacy performance.

Citing Articles

Developing a quality framework for community pharmacy: a systematic review of international literature.

Hindi A, Campbell S, Jacobs S, Schafheutle E BMJ Open. 2024; 14(2):e079820.

PMID: 38365299 PMC: 10875530. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079820.


Systematic review on the effects of the physical and social aspects of community pharmacy spaces on service users and staff.

Dhital R, Sakulwach S, Robert G, Vasilikou C, Sin J Perspect Public Health. 2022; 142(2):77-93.

PMID: 35274562 PMC: 8918882. DOI: 10.1177/17579139221080608.


Determinants of community pharmacy utilisation among the adult population in Malaysia: findings from the National Health and Morbidity Survey 2019.

Hamidi N, Tan Y, Jawahir S, Tan E BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21(1):649.

PMID: 34217293 PMC: 8254968. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06656-1.


Quality of Pharmaceutical Services in Independent Pharmacies and Pharmacy Chains in Poland from the Patient Perspective.

Bratkowska K, Religioni U, Krysinski J, Merks P Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020; 14:2459-2467.

PMID: 33363362 PMC: 7754641. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S284014.


Perceptions and trends in the use of community pharmacies in Ghana.

Okai G, Abekah-Nkrumah G, Asuming P J Pharm Policy Pract. 2019; 12:25.

PMID: 31548892 PMC: 6749712. DOI: 10.1186/s40545-019-0186-x.


References
1.
Fitzpatrick R . Surveys of patients satisfaction: I--Important general considerations. BMJ. 1991; 302(6781):887-9. PMC: 1669267. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.302.6781.887. View

2.
Horvat N, Kos M . Development and initial validation of a patient satisfaction with pharmacy performance questionnaire (PSPP-Q). Eval Health Prof. 2010; 33(2):197-215. DOI: 10.1177/0163278710361924. View

3.
Ware Jr J, Snyder M, Wright W, Davies A . Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval Program Plann. 1982; 6(3-4):247-63. DOI: 10.1016/0149-7189(83)90005-8. View

4.
Kavadas V, Blazeby J, Conroy T, Sezer O, Holzner B, Koller M . Development of an EORTC disease-specific quality of life questionnaire for use in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2003; 39(9):1259-63. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(03)00236-3. View

5.
Gasquet I, Villeminot S, Estaquio C, Durieux P, Ravaud P, Falissard B . Construction of a questionnaire measuring outpatients' opinion of quality of hospital consultation departments. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004; 2:43. PMC: 516447. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-43. View