» Articles » PMID: 21978053

In Vivo MR Acoustic Radiation Force Imaging in the Porcine Liver

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2011 Oct 8
PMID 21978053
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in the abdomen can be sensitive to acoustic aberrations that can exist in the beam path of a single sonication. Having an accurate method to quickly visualize the transducer focus without damaging tissue could assist with executing the treatment plan accurately and predicting these changes and obstacles. By identifying these obstacles, MR acoustic radiation force imaging (MR-ARFI) provides a reliable method for visualizing the transducer focus quickly without damaging tissue and allows accurate execution of the treatment plan.

Methods: MR-ARFI was used to view the HIFU focus, using a gated spin echo flyback readout-segmented echo-planar imaging sequence. HIFU spots in a phantom and in the livers of five live pigs under general anesthesia were created with a 550 kHz extracorporeal phased array transducer initially localized with a phase-dithered MR-tracking sequence to locate microcoils embedded in the transducer. MR-ARFI spots were visualized, observing the change of focal displacement and ease of steering. Finally, MR-ARFI was implemented as the principle liver HIFU calibration system, and MR-ARFI measurements of the focal location relative to the thermal ablation location in breath-hold and breathing experiments were performed.

Results: Measuring focal displacement with MR-ARFI was achieved in the phantom and in vivo liver. In one in vivo experiment, where MR-ARFI images were acquired repeatedly at the same location with different powers, the displacement had a linear relationship with power [y = 0.04x + 0.83 μm (R(2) = 0.96)]. In another experiment, the displacement images depicted the electronic steering of the focus inside the liver. With the new calibration system, the target focal location before thermal ablation was successfully verified. The entire calibration protocol delivered 20.2 J of energy to the animal (compared to greater than 800 J for a test thermal ablation). ARFI displacement maps were compared with thermal ablations during seven breath-hold ablations. The error was 0.83 ± 0.38 mm in the S/I direction and 0.99 ± 0.45 mm in the L/R direction. For six spots in breathing ablations, the mean error in the nonrespiration direction was 1.02 ± 0.89 mm.

Conclusions: MR-ARFI has the potential to improve free-breathing plan execution accuracy compared to current calibration and acoustic beam adjustment practices. Gating the acquisition allows for visualization of the focal spot over the course of respiratory motion, while also being insensitive to motion effects that can complicate a thermal test spot. That MR-ARFI measures a mechanical property at the focus also makes it insensitive to high perfusion, of particular importance to highly perfused organs such as the liver.

Citing Articles

Computational predictions of magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging for breast cancer focused ultrasound therapy.

Nelson C, Kline M, Payne A, Dillon C Int J Hyperthermia. 2025; 42(1):2452927.

PMID: 39842813 PMC: 11902895. DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2025.2452927.


SPatiotemporal-ENcoded acoustic radiation force imaging of focused ultrasound.

Qi X, Sun J, Zhu J, Kong D, Roberts N, Dong Y Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1184629.

PMID: 37180550 PMC: 10172656. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1184629.


Magnetic Resonance Acoustic Radiation Force Imaging (MR-ARFI) for the monitoring of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in anisotropic tissue.

Choquet K, Vappou J, Cabras P, Ishak O, Gangi A, Breton E MAGMA. 2023; 36(5):737-747.

PMID: 36723689 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-023-01062-6.


A Review of Imaging Methods to Assess Ultrasound-Mediated Ablation.

Fite B, Wang J, Ghanouni P, Ferrara K BME Front. 2022; 2022.

PMID: 35957844 PMC: 9364780. DOI: 10.34133/2022/9758652.


Reduced-field of view three-dimensional MR acoustic radiation force imaging with a low-rank reconstruction for targeting transcranial focused ultrasound.

Luo H, Sigona M, Manuel T, Phipps M, Chen L, Caskey C Magn Reson Med. 2022; 88(6):2419-2431.

PMID: 35916311 PMC: 9529839. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29403.


References
1.
Gedroyc W . New clinical applications of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 17(3):189-94. DOI: 10.1097/RMR.0b013e318038f782. View

2.
Kaye E, Chen J, Pauly K . Rapid MR-ARFI method for focal spot localization during focused ultrasound therapy. Magn Reson Med. 2011; 65(3):738-43. PMC: 4099471. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22662. View

3.
McDannold N, Maier S . Magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging. Med Phys. 2008; 35(8):3748-58. PMC: 2673647. DOI: 10.1118/1.2956712. View

4.
Murat F, Gelet A . Current status of high-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: technology, clinical outcomes, and future. Curr Urol Rep. 2008; 9(2):113-21. DOI: 10.1007/s11934-008-0022-3. View

5.
Dumoulin C, Mallozzi R, Darrow R, Schmidt E . Phase-field dithering for active catheter tracking. Magn Reson Med. 2010; 63(5):1398-403. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22297. View