» Articles » PMID: 21977227

Looking the Part: Social Status Cues Shape Race Perception

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2011 Oct 7
PMID 21977227
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is commonly believed that race is perceived through another's facial features, such as skin color. In the present research, we demonstrate that cues to social status that often surround a face systematically change the perception of its race. Participants categorized the race of faces that varied along White-Black morph continua and that were presented with high-status or low-status attire. Low-status attire increased the likelihood of categorization as Black, whereas high-status attire increased the likelihood of categorization as White; and this influence grew stronger as race became more ambiguous (Experiment 1). When faces with high-status attire were categorized as Black or faces with low-status attire were categorized as White, participants' hand movements nevertheless revealed a simultaneous attraction to select the other race-category response (stereotypically tied to the status cue) before arriving at a final categorization. Further, this attraction effect grew as race became more ambiguous (Experiment 2). Computational simulations then demonstrated that these effects may be accounted for by a neurally plausible person categorization system, in which contextual cues come to trigger stereotypes that in turn influence race perception. Together, the findings show how stereotypes interact with physical cues to shape person categorization, and suggest that social and contextual factors guide the perception of race.

Citing Articles

Interracial contact shapes racial bias in the learning of person-knowledge.

Welte M, Dang T, Rosenblum S, Kubota J, Cloutier J Commun Psychol. 2025; 3(1):6.

PMID: 39837957 PMC: 11751151. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-025-00187-9.


Priors and prejudice: hierarchical predictive processing in intergroup perception.

McGovern H, Otten M Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1386370.

PMID: 38939217 PMC: 11210009. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1386370.


Stereotypes bias social class perception from faces: The roles of race, gender, affect, and attractiveness.

Bjornsdottir R, Beacon E Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024; 77(11):2339-2353.

PMID: 38253563 PMC: 11529118. DOI: 10.1177/17470218241230469.


Political representation and perinatal outcomes to Black, White, and Hispanic people in Georgia: a cross-sectional study.

Stanhope K, Kapila P, Umerani A, Hossain A, Abu-Salah M, Singisetti V Ann Epidemiol. 2023; 87.

PMID: 37689094 PMC: 10842944. DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.09.001.


Facial Expression Stereotypes of Male and Female Adults and Children: Do Facial Expression Stereotypes of Adults Apply to Children?.

Zhang X, Liu X Arch Sex Behav. 2023; 53(1):223-233.

PMID: 37626260 DOI: 10.1007/s10508-023-02677-5.


References
1.
Zeger S, Liang K . Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 1986; 42(1):121-30. View

2.
Bargh J, Chen M, Burrows L . Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996; 71(2):230-44. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.230. View

3.
Freeman J, Dale R, Farmer T . Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Front Psychol. 2011; 2:59. PMC: 3110497. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00059. View

4.
Hill H, Bruce V, Akamatsu S . Perceiving the sex and race of faces: the role of shape and colour. Proc Biol Sci. 1995; 261(1362):367-73. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0161. View

5.
Ratcliff N, Hugenberg K, Shriver E, Bernstein M . The allure of status: high-status targets are privileged in face processing and memory. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011; 37(8):1003-15. DOI: 10.1177/0146167211407210. View