» Articles » PMID: 21973359

Masker Location Uncertainty Reveals Evidence for Suppression of Maskers in Two-talker Contexts

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2011 Oct 7
PMID 21973359
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In many natural settings, spatial release from masking aids speech intelligibility, especially when there are competing talkers. This paper describes a series of three experiments that investigate the role of prior knowledge of masker location on phoneme identification and spatial release from masking. In contrast to previous work, these experiments use initial stop-consonant identification as a test of target intelligibility to ensure that listeners had little time to switch the focus of spatial attention during the task. The first experiment shows that target phoneme identification was worse when a masker played from an unexpected location (increasing the consonant identification threshold by 2.6 dB) compared to when an energetically very similar and symmetrically located masker came from an expected location. In the second and third experiments, target phoneme identification was worse (increasing target threshold levels by 2.0 and 2.6 dB, respectively) when the target was played unexpectedly on the side from which the masker was expected compared to when the target came from an unexpected, symmetrical location in the hemifield opposite the expected location of the masker. These results support the idea that listeners modulate spatial attention by both focusing resources on the expected target location and withdrawing attentional resources from expected locations of interfering sources.

Citing Articles

Target voice probability influences enhancement in auditory selective attention.

Daly H, Pitt M Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023; 85(3):879-888.

PMID: 36918507 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02683-8.


High Oxygen Exchange to Music Indicates Auditory Distractibility in Acquired Brain Injury: An fNIRS Study with a Vector-Based Phase Analysis.

Jeong E, Ryu H, Shin J, Kwon G, Jo G, Lee J Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):16737.

PMID: 30425287 PMC: 6233191. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35172-2.


Similar abilities of musicians and non-musicians to segregate voices by fundamental frequency.

Deroche M, Limb C, Chatterjee M, Gracco V J Acoust Soc Am. 2017; 142(4):1739.

PMID: 29092612 PMC: 5626570. DOI: 10.1121/1.5005496.


Melodic Contour Identification Reflects the Cognitive Threshold of Aging.

Jeong E, Ryu H Front Aging Neurosci. 2016; 8:134.

PMID: 27378907 PMC: 4904015. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00134.


Effects of forward masking on sound localization in cats: basic findings with broadband maskers.

Gai Y, Ruhland J, Yin T J Neurophysiol. 2013; 110(7):1600-10.

PMID: 23843432 PMC: 4042416. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00255.2013.

References
1.
Freyman R, Balakrishnan U, Helfer K . Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001; 109(5 Pt 1):2112-22. DOI: 10.1121/1.1354984. View

2.
Rhodes G . Auditory attention and the representation of spatial information. Percept Psychophys. 1987; 42(1):1-14. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211508. View

3.
Kanai K, Ikeda K, Tayama T . The effect of exogenous spatial attention on auditory information processing. Psychol Res. 2005; 71(4):418-26. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0024-4. View

4.
Connine C . It's not what you hear but how often you hear it: on the neglected role of phonological variant frequency in auditory word recognition. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005; 11(6):1084-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196741. View

5.
Alais D, Carlile S . Synchronizing to real events: subjective audiovisual alignment scales with perceived auditory depth and speed of sound. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(6):2244-7. PMC: 548526. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0407034102. View