Bacterial Cellulose-hydroxyapatite Nanocomposites for Bone Regeneration

Overview

Journal Int J Biomater

Publisher Wiley

Date 2011 Oct 1

PMID 21961004

Citations 30

Authors

S Saska

H S Barud

A M M Gaspar

R Marchetto

S J L Ribeiro

Y Messaddeq

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop and to evaluate the biological properties of bacterial cellulose-hydroxyapatite (BC-HA) nanocomposite membranes for bone regeneration. Nanocomposites were prepared from bacterial cellulose membranes sequentially incubated in solutions of CaCl(2) followed by Na(2)HPO(4). BC-HA membranes were evaluated in noncritical bone defects in rat tibiae at 1, 4, and 16 weeks. Thermogravimetric analyses showed that the amount of the mineral phase was 40%-50% of the total weight. Spectroscopy, electronic microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray analyses, and X-ray diffraction showed formation of HA crystals on BC nanofibres. Low crystallinity HA crystals presented Ca/P a molar ratio of 1.5 (calcium-deficient HA), similar to physiological bone. Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy analysis showed bands assigned to phosphate and carbonate ions. In vivo tests showed no inflammatory reaction after 1 week. After 4 weeks, defects were observed to be completely filled in by new bone tissue. The BC-HA membranes were effective for bone regeneration.

Citing Articles

Comparative histomorphological assessment of the osteoinductive capacity of a nanofibrillated cellulose-based composite and autologous blood clot.

Tuleubayev B, Kamyshanskiy Y, Saginova D, Akhmetova S, Vinokurov V, Koshanova A J Exp Orthop. 2024; 11(4):e70067.

PMID: 39507299 PMC: 11538357. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70067.

Advancements in application of chitosan and cyclodextrins in biomedicine and pharmaceutics: recent progress and future trends.

Bahavarnia F, Hasanzadeh M, Bahavarnia P, Shadjou N RSC Adv. 2024; 14(19):13384-13412.

PMID: 38660530 PMC: 11041621. DOI: 10.1039/d4ra01370k.

Self-flocculation behaviour of cellulose-based bioflocculant synthesized from sewage water grown Chlorella sorokiniana and Scenedesmus abundans.

Shah S, Lamba B, Tiwari A, Sharma R Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2024; 47(5):725-736.

PMID: 38582779 DOI: 10.1007/s00449-024-03009-0.

Harnessing Natural Polymers for Nano-Scaffolds in Bone Tissue Engineering: A Comprehensive Overview of Bone Disease Treatment.

Saurav S, Sharma P, Kumar A, Tabassum Z, Girdhar M, Mamidi N Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024; 46(1):585-611.

PMID: 38248340 PMC: 10814241. DOI: 10.3390/cimb46010038.

Fabrication and Characterization of a Polydopamine-Modified Bacterial Cellulose and Sugarcane Filter Cake-Derived Hydroxyapatite Composite Scaffold.

Boyetey M, Sukyai P, Kamonsutthipaijit N, Nijpanich S, Chanlek N ACS Omega. 2023; 8(45):43295-43303.

PMID: 38024664 PMC: 10652255. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c07266.

References

Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink H, Bohn A . Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2005; 44(22):3358-93. DOI: 10.1002/anie.200460587. View

Grande C, Torres F, Gomez C, Bano M . Nanocomposites of bacterial cellulose/hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater. 2009; 5(5):1605-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.022. View

Armstrong J, Han B, Kuwahara K, Yang Z, Magyar C, Dry S . The effect of three hemostatic agents on early bone healing in an animal model. BMC Surg. 2010; 10:37. PMC: 3009953. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-10-37. View

Song J, Kim H, Kim H . Collagen-apatite nanocomposite membranes for guided bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007; 83(1):248-57. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30790. View

Fang B, Wan Y, Tang T, Gao C, Dai K . Proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells on hydroxyapatite/bacterial cellulose nanocomposite scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009; 15(5):1091-8. DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0110. View

Bodin A, Gustafsson L, Gatenholm P . Surface-engineered bacterial cellulose as template for crystallization of calcium phosphate. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2006; 17(4):435-47. DOI: 10.1163/156856206776374106. View

Le Guehennec L, Layrolle P, Daculsi G . A review of bioceramics and fibrin sealant. Eur Cell Mater. 2004; 8:1-10. DOI: 10.22203/ecm.v008a01. View

Hutchens S, Benson R, Evans B, ONeill H, Rawn C . Biomimetic synthesis of calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite in a natural hydrogel. Biomaterials. 2006; 27(26):4661-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.04.032. View

Mello L, Feltrin L, Fontes Neto P, Ferraz F . Duraplasty with biosynthetic cellulose: an experimental study. J Neurosurg. 1997; 86(1):143-50. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1997.86.1.0143. View

10.

Duskova M, Leamerova E, Sosna B, Gojis O . Guided tissue regeneration, barrier membranes and reconstruction of the cleft maxillary alveolus. J Craniofac Surg. 2006; 17(6):1153-60. DOI: 10.1097/01.scs.0000236435.90097.7b. View

11.

Batista Jr E, Novaes Jr A, Simonpietri J, Batista F . Use of bovine-derived anorganic bone associated with guided tissue regeneration in intrabony defects. Six-month evaluation at re-entry. J Periodontol. 1999; 70(9):1000-7. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1999.70.9.1000. View

12.

Bodhibukkana C, Srichana T, Kaewnopparat S, Tangthong N, Bouking P, Martin G . Composite membrane of bacterially-derived cellulose and molecularly imprinted polymer for use as a transdermal enantioselective controlled-release system of racemic propranolol. J Control Release. 2006; 113(1):43-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.03.007. View

13.

Novaes Jr A, Batista Jr E, Filho E . Guided tissue regeneration associated with bovine-derived anorganic bone in mandibular class II furcation defects. 6-month results at re-entry. J Periodontol. 2000; 71(6):904-11. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.6.904. View

14.

Mendes P, Rahal S, Pereira-Junior O, Fabris V, Lenharo S, Lima-Neto J . In vivo and in vitro evaluation of an Acetobacter xylinum synthesized microbial cellulose membrane intended for guided tissue repair. Acta Vet Scand. 2009; 51:12. PMC: 2667521. DOI: 10.1186/1751-0147-51-12. View

15.

Nge T, Sugiyama J . Surface functional group dependent apatite formation on bacterial cellulose microfibrils network in a simulated body fluid. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006; 81(1):124-34. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31020. View

16.

Sculean A, Schwarz F, Chiantella G, Donos N, Arweiler N, Brecx M . Five-year results of a prospective, randomized, controlled study evaluating treatment of intra-bony defects with a natural bone mineral and GTR. J Clin Periodontol. 2007; 34(1):72-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01007.x. View

17.

Strietzel F, Khongkhunthian P, Khattiya R, Patchanee P, Reichart P . Healing pattern of bone defects covered by different membrane types--a histologic study in the porcine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005; 78(1):35-46. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30452. View

18.

dos Anjos B, Novaes Jr A, Meffert R, Barboza E . Clinical comparison of cellulose and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in the treatment of class II furcations in mandibular molars with 6-month re-entry. J Periodontol. 1998; 69(4):454-9. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.4.454. View

19.

Fontana J, De Souza A, Fontana C, Torriani I, Moreschi J, Gallotti B . Acetobacter cellulose pellicle as a temporary skin substitute. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1990; 24-25:253-64. DOI: 10.1007/BF02920250. View

20.

Sauer G, Wuthier R . Fourier transform infrared characterization of mineral phases formed during induction of mineralization by collagenase-released matrix vesicles in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1988; 263(27):13718-24. View