» Articles » PMID: 21949675

The Temporal Dynamics of Voluntary Emotion Regulation

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2011 Sep 28
PMID 21949675
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Neuroimaging has demonstrated that voluntary emotion regulation is effective in reducing amygdala activation to aversive stimuli during regulation. However, to date little is known about the sustainability of these neural effects once active emotion regulation has been terminated.

Methodology/principal Findings: We addressed this issue by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in healthy female subjects. We performed an active emotion regulation task using aversive visual scenes (task 1) and a subsequent passive viewing task using the same stimuli (task 2). Here we demonstrate not only a significantly reduced amygdala activation during active regulation but also a sustained regulation effect on the amygdala in the subsequent passive viewing task. This effect was related to an immediate increase of amygdala signal in task 1 once active emotion regulation has been terminated: The larger this peak postregulation signal in the amygdala in task 1, the smaller the sustained regulation effect in task 2.

Conclusions/significance: In summary, we found clear evidence that effects of voluntary emotion regulation extend beyond the period of active regulation. These findings are of importance for the understanding of emotion regulation in general, for disorders of emotion regulation and for psychotherapeutic interventions.

Citing Articles

Design and methods of the research unit 5187 PREACT (towards precision psychotherapy for non-respondent patients: from signatures to predictions to clinical utility) - a study protocol for a multicentre observational study in outpatient clinics.

Langhammer T, Unterfeld C, Blankenburg F, Erk S, Fehm L, Haynes J BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e094110.

PMID: 40010810 PMC: 11865781. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094110.


Neurobiology and systems biology of stress resilience.

Kalisch R, Russo S, Muller M Physiol Rev. 2024; 104(3):1205-1263.

PMID: 38483288 PMC: 11381009. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00042.2023.


Unpacking reappraisal: a systematic review of fMRI studies of distancing and reinterpretation.

Denny B, Jungles M, Goodson P, Dicker E, Chavez J, Jones J Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023; 18(1).

PMID: 37757486 PMC: 10561539. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsad050.


Understanding the benefits of extrinsic emotion regulation in depression.

Massarwe A, Cohen N Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1120653.

PMID: 37179872 PMC: 10172593. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1120653.


A pharmacological challenge paradigm to assess neural signatures of script-elicited acute dissociation in women with post-traumatic stress disorder.

Mertens Y, Manthey A, Sierk A, de Jong P, Walter H, Daniels J BJPsych Open. 2023; 9(3):e78.

PMID: 37128866 PMC: 10228236. DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2023.34.


References
1.
Ishai A, Pessoa L, Bikle P, Ungerleider L . Repetition suppression of faces is modulated by emotion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(26):9827-32. PMC: 470759. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0403559101. View

2.
Roemer L, Borkovec T . Effects of suppressing thoughts about emotional material. J Abnorm Psychol. 1994; 103(3):467-74. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.103.3.467. View

3.
Phan K, Fitzgerald D, Nathan P, Moore G, Uhde T, Tancer M . Neural substrates for voluntary suppression of negative affect: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiatry. 2005; 57(3):210-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.030. View

4.
Abramowitz J, Tolin D, Street G . Paradoxical effects of thought suppression: a meta-analysis of controlled studies. Clin Psychol Rev. 2001; 21(5):683-703. DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7358(00)00057-x. View

5.
Kalisch R, Wiech K, Herrmann K, Dolan R . Neural correlates of self-distraction from anxiety and a process model of cognitive emotion regulation. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006; 18(8):1266-76. PMC: 2638061. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.1266. View