» Articles » PMID: 21949543

The Value of Clinical Examination in Diagnosing Pelvic Fractures in Blunt Trauma Patients: a Brief Review

Overview
Date 2011 Sep 28
PMID 21949543
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Of The Study: To evaluate the value of a pelvic X-ray compared to clinical examination in diagnosing pelvic ring fractures, using computed tomography (CT) as the gold standard, in alert [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≥ 13] adult blunt trauma patients in the emergency room.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed and Embase. The results were screened on their titles and abstracts using in- and exclusion criteria. Subsequently, the selected articles were critically appraised for their relevance and validity.

Results: Two studies investigating the diagnostic value of clinical examination and pelvic X-ray compared to CT were identified. Both studies demonstrate higher negative predictive values for clinical examination [0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-1.0) and 1.0 (95% CI 0.99-1.0)] compared to the negative predictive values of pelvic X-ray [0.98 (95% CI 0.93-0.99) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.99-1.0)]. The positive predictive values for clinical examination were low [0.18 (95% CI 0.16-0.23) and 0.35 (95% CI 0.30-0.42)] compared to pelvic X-ray [0.97 (95% CI 0.96-0.98) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.90-0.99)].

Conclusions: In alert blunt trauma patients, pelvic X-ray only has additional diagnostic value for the detection of pelvic ring fractures if the clinical examination is positive. Pelvic X-ray should not be performed if the clinical examination is negative. In this manner, the expenditure of time, costs, and radiation are optimized.

Citing Articles

Imaging in polytrauma - Principles and current concepts.

Thippeswamy P, Rajasekaran R J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021; 16:106-113.

PMID: 33717944 PMC: 7920130. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.12.006.


Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination for detecting pelvic fractures among blunt trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Okada Y, Nishioka N, Ohtsuru S, Tsujimoto Y World J Emerg Surg. 2020; 15(1):56.

PMID: 33008428 PMC: 7531119. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-020-00334-z.

References
1.
Salvino C, Esposito T, Smith D, Dries D, Marshall W, Flisak M . Routine pelvic x-ray studies in awake blunt trauma patients: a sensible policy?. J Trauma. 1992; 33(3):413-6. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199209000-00013. View

2.
Shlamovitz G, Mower W, Bergman J, Chuang K, Crisp J, Hardy D . How (un)useful is the pelvic ring stability examination in diagnosing mechanically unstable pelvic fractures in blunt trauma patients?. J Trauma. 2009; 66(3):815-20. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31817c96e1. View

3.
Ham S, van Walsum A, Vierhout P . Predictive value of the hip flexion test for fractures of the pelvis. Injury. 1996; 27(8):543-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(96)00093-9. View

4.
Gross E, Niedens B . Validation of a decision instrument to limit pelvic radiography in blunt trauma. J Emerg Med. 2005; 28(3):263-266. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.10.013. View

5.
Ersoy G, Karcioglu O, Enginbas Y, User N . Should all patients with blunt trauma undergo 'routine' pelvic X-ray?. Eur J Emerg Med. 1995; 2(2):65-8. DOI: 10.1097/00063110-199506000-00002. View