» Articles » PMID: 21949482

Biological Dosimetry by the Triage Dicentric Chromosome Assay - Further Validation of International Networking

Overview
Journal Radiat Meas
Specialty Radiology
Date 2011 Sep 28
PMID 21949482
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Biological dosimetry is an essential tool for estimating radiation doses received to personnel when physical dosimetry is not available or inadequate. The current preferred biodosimetry method is based on the measurement of radiation-specific dicentric chromosomes in exposed individuals' peripheral blood lymphocytes. However, this method is labour-, time- and expertise-demanding. Consequently, for mass casualty applications, strategies have been developed to increase its throughput. One such strategy is to develop validated cytogenetic biodosimetry laboratory networks, both national and international. In a previous study, the dicentric chromosome assay (DCA) was validated in our cytogenetic biodosimetry network involving five geographically dispersed laboratories. A complementary strategy to further enhance the throughput of the DCA among inter-laboratory networks is to use a triage DCA where dose assessments are made by truncating the labour-demanding and time-consuming metaphase-spread analysis to 20 to 50 metaphase spreads instead of routine 500 to 1000 metaphase spread analysis. Our laboratory network also validated this triage DCA, however, these dose estimates were made using calibration curves generated in each laboratory from the blood samples irradiated in a single laboratory. In an emergency situation, dose estimates made using pre-existing calibration curves which may vary according to radiation type and dose rate and therefore influence the assessed dose. Here, we analyze the effect of using a pre-existing calibration curve on assessed dose among our network laboratories. The dose estimates were made by analyzing 1000 metaphase spreads as well as triage quality scoring and compared to actual physical doses applied to the samples for validation. The dose estimates in the laboratory partners were in good agreement with the applied physical doses and determined to be adequate for guidance in the treatment of acute radiation syndrome.

Citing Articles

RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: Inter-Assay Comparison of Eight Dosimetry Assays.

Port M, Barquinero J, Endesfelder D, Moquet J, Oestreicher U, Terzoudi G Radiat Res. 2023; 199(6):535-555.

PMID: 37310880 PMC: 10508307. DOI: 10.1667/RADE-22-00207.1.


Dicentric chromosome assay using a deep learning-based automated system.

Jeong S, Oh S, Kim S, Jang S, Kang Y, Kim H Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):22097.

PMID: 36543843 PMC: 9772420. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25856-1.


Validation of a High-Throughput Dicentric Chromosome Assay Using Complex Radiation Exposures.

Royba E, Repin M, Balajee A, Shuryak I, Pampou S, Karan C Radiat Res. 2022; 199(1):1-16.

PMID: 35994701 PMC: 9947868. DOI: 10.1667/RADE-22-00007.1.


Transcriptomics for radiation biodosimetry: progress and challenges.

Amundson S Int J Radiat Biol. 2021; 99(6):925-933.

PMID: 33970766 PMC: 10026363. DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1928784.


The Efficacy of Periodic Complete Blood Count Tests in Evaluation of the Health Status of Radiation Workers in Iran: A Systematic Review.

Zare A, Mortazavi S Iran J Public Health. 2020; 49(4):628-636.

PMID: 32548042 PMC: 7283191.


References
1.
Garcia O, Ramalho A, Di Giorgio M, S Mir S, Espinoza M, Manzano J . Intercomparison in cytogenetic dosimetry among five laboratories from Latin America. Mutat Res. 1995; 327(1-2):33-9. DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(94)00066-e. View

2.
Wojcik A, Lloyd D, Romm H, Roy L . Biological dosimetry for triage of casualties in a large-scale radiological emergency:capacity of the EU member states. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2009; 138(4):397-401. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncp279. View

3.
Waselenko J, MacVittie T, Blakely W, Pesik N, Wiley A, Dickerson W . Medical management of the acute radiation syndrome: recommendations of the Strategic National Stockpile Radiation Working Group. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 140(12):1037-51. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-12-200406150-00015. View

4.
Coleman C, Hrdina C, Bader J, Norwood A, Hayhurst R, Forsha J . Medical response to a radiologic/nuclear event: integrated plan from the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Department of Health and Human Services. Ann Emerg Med. 2008; 53(2):213-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.12.021. View

5.
Wilkins R, Romm H, Kao T, Awa A, Yoshida M, Livingston G . Interlaboratory comparison of the dicentric chromosome assay for radiation biodosimetry in mass casualty events. Radiat Res. 2008; 169(5):551-60. DOI: 10.1667/RR1272.1. View