» Articles » PMID: 21948270

Portal Vein Embolisation for Extended Hepatectomy: Single-centre Experience

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2011 Sep 28
PMID 21948270
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Portal vein embolisation (PVE) induces contra-lateral liver hypertrophy to facilitate an extended hepatectomy.

Aim: This paper aims to analyse our data on PVE and extended hepatectomy. Outcome measures included success of PVE, feasibility of resections, operative morbidity and survival.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively on 33 patients (2004-2008) was performed. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier (Breslow) method. Significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Results: A total of 31 patients had successful PVE. There were 24 patients who underwent surgery. Significant hypertrophy of residual liver was noted from 230.15 (pre-embolisation) to 428.50 ml (post-embolisation) (median, p < 0.0001). A total of 16 patients had hepatectomy (14: R0; 2: R1) with a single mortality (6.25%) and 56.25% morbidity, and a median length of stay of 17 days. Median overall survival was 14 (95% CI 7.8-20.2) months. Patients who underwent resection had a median disease-specific survival of 33 (95% CI 4-62) months compared with 8.6 (95% CI 0-19.9) months for patients without resection (p = 0.14). For patients with primary hepato-biliary tumours, the median disease-specific survival was 7.9 (95% CI 4.5-11.3) months compared with a median survival of 19.7 (95% CI 0-42.2) months for patients with metastases (p = 0.07).

Conclusions: PVE is safe, facilitates R0 resection and offers the best chance of cure, especially for liver metastases.

References
1.
Broering D, Hillert C, Krupski G, Fischer L, Mueller L, Achilles E . Portal vein embolization vs. portal vein ligation for induction of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002; 6(6):905-13; discussion 913. DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(02)00122-1. View

2.
Paugam-Burtz C, Janny S, Delefosse D, Dahmani S, Dondero F, Mantz J . Prospective validation of the "fifty-fifty" criteria as an early and accurate predictor of death after liver resection in intensive care unit patients. Ann Surg. 2008; 249(1):124-8. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819279cd. View

3.
Belghiti J, Hiramatsu K, Benoist S, Massault P, Sauvanet A, Farges O . Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection. J Am Coll Surg. 2000; 191(1):38-46. DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00261-1. View

4.
Kubota K, Makuuchi M, Kusaka K, Kobayashi T, Miki K, Hasegawa K . Measurement of liver volume and hepatic functional reserve as a guide to decision-making in resectional surgery for hepatic tumors. Hepatology. 1997; 26(5):1176-81. DOI: 10.1053/jhep.1997.v26.pm0009362359. View

5.
Nagino M, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Kondo S, Uesaka K, Kin Y . Changes in hepatic lobe volume in biliary tract cancer patients after right portal vein embolization. Hepatology. 1995; 21(2):434-9. View