» Articles » PMID: 21947664

Behavioral Activation and Inhibition, Negative Affect, and Gambling Severity in a Sample of Young Adult College Students

Overview
Journal J Gambl Stud
Date 2011 Sep 28
PMID 21947664
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The prevalence of pathological gambling among college students is increasing. Few studies have directly examined the relation between reward processing and gambling severity while concurrently examining the effects of co-occurring negative affect in this at risk population. This study used Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) techniques to analyze results from an online survey of 352 female and 96 male students age 18-25. Participants completed measures of past year gambling behavior and severity of gambling problems using the Canadian Problem Gambling Index and the Problem Gambling Severity Index. Negative affect and reward processing were measured by the 21-item version of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales and the Behavioral Inhibition System and Behavioral Activation System (BIS/BAS) scales, respectively. Thirty-five percent of participants reported gambling in the previous 12 months, and 11% had gambling severity scores indicative of "moderate-risk" or "problem gambling." Gambling severity was associated with negative affect. Negative affect, in turn, was correlated with the unitary BIS scale and inversely associated with the BAS reward responsiveness scale. Reward responsiveness was also inversely associated with gambling severity. In the SEM models, the association between reward responsiveness and gambling severity was mediated by negative affect among males but not among females. Potential explanations for these findings and their implications for addressing problem gambling are discussed.

Citing Articles

Behavioral Inhibition and Fear: The Moderating Role of Emotional Competence and Gender in Preadolescents.

Baroncelli A, Righi S, Facci C, Ciucci E Children (Basel). 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40003281 PMC: 11854494. DOI: 10.3390/children12020179.


Correlates of Problematic Gambling in Emerging Adult University Students in Ireland.

Murphy M, Murphy R, Roberts A J Gambl Stud. 2024; 40(4):1987-2004.

PMID: 38849661 DOI: 10.1007/s10899-024-10323-5.


Comparison between the Effects of Acute Physical and Psychosocial Stress on Feedback-Based Learning.

Yang X, Nackley B, Friedman B Brain Sci. 2023; 13(8).

PMID: 37626484 PMC: 10452833. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13081127.


Underlying Mechanisms Involved in Gambling Disorder Severity: A Pathway Analysis Considering Genetic, Psychosocial, and Clinical Variables.

Sole-Morata N, Baenas I, Etxandi M, Granero R, Gene M, Barrot C Nutrients. 2023; 15(2).

PMID: 36678289 PMC: 9864492. DOI: 10.3390/nu15020418.


Alexithymia and Emotion Regulation Strategies in Adolescent Gamblers with and Without At-Risk Profiles.

Estevez A, Jauregui P, Macia L, Martin-Perez C J Gambl Stud. 2021; 38(1):15-29.

PMID: 34250551 PMC: 8866352. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-021-10057-8.


References
1.
King S, Abrams K, Wilkinson T . Personality, gender, and family history in the prediction of college gambling. J Gambl Stud. 2010; 26(3):347-59. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-009-9163-7. View

2.
Nestler E, Carlezon Jr W . The mesolimbic dopamine reward circuit in depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2006; 59(12):1151-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.09.018. View

3.
Treadway M, Zald D . Reconsidering anhedonia in depression: lessons from translational neuroscience. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010; 35(3):537-55. PMC: 3005986. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.06.006. View

4.
Braddock K, Dillard J, Voigt D, Stephenson M, Sopory P, Anderson J . Impulsivity partially mediates the relationship between BIS/BAS and risky health behaviors. J Pers. 2011; 79(4):793-810. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00699.x. View

5.
Shaffer H, Hall M, Vander Bilt J . Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: a research synthesis. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89(9):1369-76. PMC: 1508762. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1369. View