Completely Automated Multiresolution Edge Snapper--a New Technique for an Accurate Carotid Ultrasound IMT Measurement: Clinical Validation and Benchmarking on a Multi-institutional Database
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The aim of this paper is to describe a novel and completely automated technique for carotid artery (CA) recognition, far (distal) wall segmentation, and intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement, which is a strong clinical tool for risk assessment for cardiovascular diseases. The architecture of completely automated multiresolution edge snapper (CAMES) consists of the following two stages: 1) automated CA recognition based on a combination of scale-space and statistical classification in a multiresolution framework and 2) automated segmentation of lumen-intima (LI) and media-adventitia (MA) interfaces for the far (distal) wall and IMT measurement. Our database of 365 B-mode longitudinal carotid images is taken from four different institutions covering different ethnic backgrounds. The ground-truth (GT) database was the average manual segmentation from three clinical experts. The mean distance ± standard deviation of CAMES with respect to GT profiles for LI and MA interfaces were 0.081 ± 0.099 and 0.082 ± 0.197 mm, respectively. The IMT measurement error between CAMES and GT was 0.078 ± 0.112 mm. CAMES was benchmarked against a previously developed automated technique based on an integrated approach using feature-based extraction and classifier (CALEX). Although CAMES underestimated the IMT value, it had shown a strong improvement in segmentation errors against CALEX for LI and MA interfaces by 8% and 42%, respectively. The overall IMT measurement bias for CAMES improved by 36% against CALEX. Finally, this paper demonstrated that the figure-of-merit of CAMES was 95.8% compared with 87.4% for CALEX. The combination of multiresolution CA recognition and far-wall segmentation led to an automated, low-complexity, real-time, and accurate technique for carotid IMT measurement. Validation on a multiethnic/multi-institutional data set demonstrated the robustness of the technique, which can constitute a clinically valid IMT measurement for assistance in atherosclerosis disease management.
Saba L, Maindarkar M, Johri A, Mantella L, Laird J, Khanna N Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(5):184.
PMID: 39076491 PMC: 11267214. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2505184.
Bhagawati M, Paul S, Mantella L, Johri A, Laird J, Singh I Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024; 40(6):1283-1303.
PMID: 38678144 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-024-03100-3.
Ottakath N, Al-Maadeed S, Zughaier S, Elharrouss O, Mohammed H, Chowdhury M Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(15).
PMID: 37568976 PMC: 10417708. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13152614.
Cardiovascular disease/stroke risk stratification in deep learning framework: a review.
Bhagawati M, Paul S, Agarwal S, Protogeron A, Sfikakis P, Kitas G Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2023; 13(3):557-598.
PMID: 37405023 PMC: 10315429. DOI: 10.21037/cdt-22-438.
Jain P, Dubey A, Saba L, Khanna N, Laird J, Nicolaides A J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022; 9(10).
PMID: 36286278 PMC: 9604424. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd9100326.