» Articles » PMID: 21935310

Use of Electronic Medical Records in Oncology Outcomes Research

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Health Services
Date 2011 Sep 22
PMID 21935310
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Oncology outcomes research could benefit from the use of an oncology-specific electronic medical record (EMR) network. The benefits and challenges of using EMR in general health research have been investigated; however, the utility of EMR for oncology outcomes research has not been explored. Compared to current available oncology databases and registries, an oncology-specific EMR could provide comprehensive and accurate information on clinical diagnoses, personal and medical histories, planned and actual treatment regimens, and post-treatment outcomes, to address research questions from patients, policy makers, the pharmaceutical industry, and clinicians/researchers. Specific challenges related to structural (eg, interoperability, data format/entry), clinical (eg, maintenance and continuity of records, variety of coding schemes), and research-related (eg, missing data, generalizability, privacy) issues must be addressed when building an oncology-specific EMR system. Researchers should engage with medical professional groups to guide development of EMR systems that would ultimately help improve the quality of cancer care through oncology outcomes research.

Citing Articles

Continuous multimodal data supply chain and expandable clinical decision support for oncology.

Chang J, Kim H, Baek E, Choi J, Lim J, Kim J NPJ Digit Med. 2025; 8(1):128.

PMID: 40016534 PMC: 11868524. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-025-01508-2.


Electronic health records and patient registries in medical oncology departments in Spain.

Ribelles N, Alvarez-Lopez I, Arcusa A, Chacon J, de la Haba J, Garcia-Corbacho J Clin Transl Oncol. 2021; 23(10):2099-2108.

PMID: 33864619 PMC: 8390424. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02614-9.


Nutrition Information in Oncology - Extending the Electronic Patient-Record Data Set.

Maranhao P, Pereira A, Calhau C, Ravasco P, Bozzetti F, Laviano A J Med Syst. 2020; 44(11):191.

PMID: 32986139 PMC: 7520877. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-020-01649-9.


Facts and figures on medical record management from a multi super specialty hospital in Delhi NCR: A descriptive analysis.

Verma S, Midha M, Bhadoria A J Family Med Prim Care. 2020; 9(1):418-423.

PMID: 32110629 PMC: 7014864. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_612_19.


Warfarin vs. apixaban in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, and analysis by concomitant antiarrhythmic medication use: A national retrospective study.

Wanat M, Wang X, Paranjpe R, Chen H, Johnson M, Fleming M Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2019; 3(4):674-683.

PMID: 31624787 PMC: 6781914. DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12221.


References
1.
Ambinder E . Electronic health records. J Oncol Pract. 2010; 1(2):57-63. PMC: 2793588. DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2005.1.2.57. View

2.
National Quality Measures Clearinghouse , Agency For Healthcare Research And Quality . Imaging studies for low back pain. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2011; 22(4):306-11. DOI: 10.1080/15360280802537332. View

3.
Dean B, Lam J, Natoli J, Butler Q, Aguilar D, Nordyke R . Review: use of electronic medical records for health outcomes research: a literature review. Med Care Res Rev. 2009; 66(6):611-38. DOI: 10.1177/1077558709332440. View

4.
Hayrinen K, Saranto K, Nykanen P . Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. Int J Med Inform. 2007; 77(5):291-304. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.09.001. View

5.
Cleator S, Heller W, Coombes R . Triple-negative breast cancer: therapeutic options. Lancet Oncol. 2007; 8(3):235-44. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70074-8. View