The Fusiform Response to Faces: Explicit Versus Implicit Processing of Emotion
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Regions of the fusiform gyrus (FG) respond preferentially to faces over other classes of visual stimuli. It remains unclear whether emotional face information modulates FG activity. In the present study, whole-head magnetoencephalography (MEG) was obtained from fifteen healthy adults who viewed emotionally expressive faces and made button responses based upon emotion (explicit condition) or age (implicit condition). Dipole source modeling produced source waveforms for left and right primary visual and left and right fusiform areas. Stronger left FG activity (M170) to fearful than happy or neutral faces was observed only in the explicit task, suggesting that directed attention to the emotional content of faces facilitates observation of M170 valence modulation. A strong association between M170 FG activity and reaction times in the explicit task provided additional evidence for a role of the fusiform gyrus in processing emotional information.
Pauligk S, Seidel M, Ritschel F, Geisler D, Doose A, Boehm I Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2025; 25(1):100544.
PMID: 39896205 PMC: 11787555. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100544.
Chen Y, Allison O, Green H, Kuschner E, Liu S, Kim M Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:917851.
PMID: 36034116 PMC: 9411513. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.917851.
Ketamine Alters Electrophysiological Responses to Emotional Faces in Major Depressive Disorder.
Lundin N, Sepe-Forrest L, Gilbert J, Carver F, Furey M, Zarate Jr C J Affect Disord. 2020; 279:239-249.
PMID: 33074143 PMC: 7781110. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.007.
Yoshimura Y, Kikuchi M, Saito D, Hirosawa T, Takahashi T, Munesue T Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):14558.
PMID: 32883965 PMC: 7471326. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71254-w.
Moreira J, Telzer E Dev Sci. 2017; 21(1).
PMID: 29282834 PMC: 5752112. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12484.