» Articles » PMID: 21932258

The Fusiform Response to Faces: Explicit Versus Implicit Processing of Emotion

Overview
Journal Hum Brain Mapp
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Sep 21
PMID 21932258
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Regions of the fusiform gyrus (FG) respond preferentially to faces over other classes of visual stimuli. It remains unclear whether emotional face information modulates FG activity. In the present study, whole-head magnetoencephalography (MEG) was obtained from fifteen healthy adults who viewed emotionally expressive faces and made button responses based upon emotion (explicit condition) or age (implicit condition). Dipole source modeling produced source waveforms for left and right primary visual and left and right fusiform areas. Stronger left FG activity (M170) to fearful than happy or neutral faces was observed only in the explicit task, suggesting that directed attention to the emotional content of faces facilitates observation of M170 valence modulation. A strong association between M170 FG activity and reaction times in the explicit task provided additional evidence for a role of the fusiform gyrus in processing emotional information.

Citing Articles

Overcontrol in anorexia nervosa: Elevated prefrontal activity and amygdala connectivity in a working memory task with food distractors.

Pauligk S, Seidel M, Ritschel F, Geisler D, Doose A, Boehm I Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2025; 25(1):100544.

PMID: 39896205 PMC: 11787555. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100544.


Maturational trajectory of fusiform gyrus neural activity when viewing faces: From 4 months to 4 years old.

Chen Y, Allison O, Green H, Kuschner E, Liu S, Kim M Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:917851.

PMID: 36034116 PMC: 9411513. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.917851.


Ketamine Alters Electrophysiological Responses to Emotional Faces in Major Depressive Disorder.

Lundin N, Sepe-Forrest L, Gilbert J, Carver F, Furey M, Zarate Jr C J Affect Disord. 2020; 279:239-249.

PMID: 33074143 PMC: 7781110. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.007.


Markers for the central serotonin system correlate to verbal ability and paralinguistic social voice processing in autism spectrum disorder.

Yoshimura Y, Kikuchi M, Saito D, Hirosawa T, Takahashi T, Munesue T Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):14558.

PMID: 32883965 PMC: 7471326. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71254-w.


Mother still knows best: Maternal influence uniquely modulates adolescent reward sensitivity during risk taking.

Moreira J, Telzer E Dev Sci. 2017; 21(1).

PMID: 29282834 PMC: 5752112. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12484.


References
1.
Scheuerecker J, Frodl T, Koutsouleris N, Zetzsche T, Wiesmann M, Kleemann A . Cerebral differences in explicit and implicit emotional processing--an fMRI study. Neuropsychobiology. 2007; 56(1):32-9. DOI: 10.1159/000110726. View

2.
Fox E, Lester V, Russo R, Bowles R, Pichler A, Dutton K . Facial Expressions of Emotion: Are Angry Faces Detected More Efficiently?. Cogn Emot. 2007; 14(1):61-92. PMC: 1839771. DOI: 10.1080/026999300378996. View

3.
Gur R, Sara R, Hagendoorn M, Marom O, Hughett P, Macy L . A method for obtaining 3-dimensional facial expressions and its standardization for use in neurocognitive studies. J Neurosci Methods. 2002; 115(2):137-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0270(02)00006-7. View

4.
Gur R, Schroeder L, Turner T, McGrath C, Chan R, Turetsky B . Brain activation during facial emotion processing. Neuroimage. 2002; 16(3 Pt 1):651-62. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1097. View

5.
Caharel S, Courtay N, Bernard C, Lalonde R, Rebai M . Familiarity and emotional expression influence an early stage of face processing: an electrophysiological study. Brain Cogn. 2005; 59(1):96-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2005.05.005. View