» Articles » PMID: 21929658

Mutated IDH1 is a Favorable Prognostic Factor for Type 2 Gliomatosis Cerebri

Overview
Journal Brain Pathol
Date 2011 Sep 21
PMID 21929658
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The prognostic significance of IDH1 mutations has been demonstrated in gliomas. It is unclear whether IDH1 mutation is also a prognostic factor in gliomatosis cerebri (GC). Primary GCs can be grouped into type 1 GCs, which have the classical diffuse growth pattern without mass formation, and type 2 GCs, which form neoplastic masses in addition to classic diffuse lesions. In this study, the prognostic relevance of IDH1/2 mutations in 74 GCs (43 type 1 and 31 type 2) was evaluated. We detected 33 (44.6%) IDH1 mutations, including R132H and R132S, by bidirectional Sanger sequencing. No mutations were detected in IDH2. The percentage of 2-year overall survival for wild-type IDH1 patients was 46 vs. 72% for patients with IDH1-mutated tumors. Mutations of IDH1 were strongly correlated with both increased overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with type 2 GCs, and IDH1 mutations were also an independent prognostic factor predicting increased OS and PFS in type 2 GC patients in multivariate analysis. However, IDH1 mutations did not correlate with survival outcomes in patients with type 1 GCs. Finally, the subgroup of GC, which has IDH1 wild-type and additional solid component showed the worst prognosis.

Citing Articles

Clinical relevance of molecular subgrouping of gliomatosis cerebri per 2016 WHO classification: a clinicopathological study of 89 cases.

Kwon M, Kang S, Cho H, Lee J, Kim S, Suh Y Brain Pathol. 2019; 30(2):235-245.

PMID: 31435963 PMC: 8018049. DOI: 10.1111/bpa.12782.


A Pediatric Case of Diffuse Glioma Diagnosed at Autopsy.

Ross J, Olar A, Fuller C Acad Forensic Pathol. 2019; 7(4):657-666.

PMID: 31240015 PMC: 6474431. DOI: 10.23907/2017.056.


Genomic copy number gains of ErbB family members predict poor clinical outcomes in glioma patients.

Liu R, Qu Y, Chen L, Pu J, Ma S, Zhang X Oncotarget. 2017; 8(54):92275-92288.

PMID: 29190914 PMC: 5696180. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.21228.


Gliomatosis Cerebri: Current Understanding and Controversies.

Ranjan S, Warren K Front Oncol. 2017; 7:165.

PMID: 28824876 PMC: 5545748. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00165.


Establishment of Anti-Human ATRX Monoclonal Antibody AMab-6.

Ogasawara S, Fujii Y, Kaneko M, Oki H, Sabit H, Nakada M Monoclon Antib Immunodiagn Immunother. 2016; 35(5):254-258.

PMID: 27788029 PMC: 5160166. DOI: 10.1089/mab.2016.0037.


References
1.
Desestret V, Ciccarino P, Ducray F, Criniere E, Boisselier B, Labussiere M . Prognostic stratification of gliomatosis cerebri by IDH1 R132H and INA expression. J Neurooncol. 2011; 105(2):219-24. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-011-0587-4. View

2.
Desclee P, Rommel D, Hernalsteen D, Godfraind C, De Coene B, Cosnard G . Gliomatosis cerebri, imaging findings of 12 cases. J Neuroradiol. 2010; 37(3):148-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurad.2009.12.001. View

3.
Kattar M, Kupsky W, Shimoyama R, Vo T, Olson M, Bargar G . Clonal analysis of gliomas. Hum Pathol. 1997; 28(10):1166-79. DOI: 10.1016/s0046-8177(97)90255-0. View

4.
Villano J, Seery T, Bressler L . Temozolomide in malignant gliomas: current use and future targets. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009; 64(4):647-55. DOI: 10.1007/s00280-009-1050-5. View

5.
Seiz M, Tuettenberg J, Meyer J, Essig M, Schmieder K, Mawrin C . Detection of IDH1 mutations in gliomatosis cerebri, but only in tumors with additional solid component: evidence for molecular subtypes. Acta Neuropathol. 2010; 120(2):261-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-010-0701-2. View