» Articles » PMID: 21924720

Impact of Inpatient Status and Gender on Small-bowel Capsule Endoscopy Findings

Overview
Date 2011 Sep 20
PMID 21924720
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is most commonly performed in the outpatient setting to evaluate obscure GI bleeding.

Objective: To determine the impact of gender and inpatient status on VCE findings.

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Two tertiary medical centers and a VA medical center.

Patients: A total of 167 inpatients and 540 outpatients undergoing 707 VCE examinations for obscure GI bleeding.

Interventions: VCE study.

Main Outcome Measurements: Patient age, sex, indication for VCE, gastric and small-bowel transit times, significant VCE findings including detection of blood in the lumen and major lesions outside the small bowel, and presence of comorbid conditions.

Results: Significant VCE findings were identified more frequently during inpatient VCE examinations (48% vs 37%, P = .009). Endoscopic placement, nongastric passage, and incomplete studies to the cecum were more common for inpatient VCE examinations. Gastric transit time, but not small-bowel transit time, was longer in inpatient VCE studies. Inpatient VCE examinations were more common in male patients (73% vs 61%, P = .004) and patients with overt bleeding (83% vs 46%, P < .05). The overall diagnostic VCE rate was higher for male patients because of a higher prevalence of angiodysplastic lesions and major findings outside the small bowel.

Limitations: Retrospective study. Lack of information regarding timing of VCE study, most recent episode of obscure bleeding, and comorbidity data for outpatients.

Conclusion: The overall diagnostic yield was higher for inpatient VCE examinations. Male patients were more likely to demonstrate significant findings on both inpatient and outpatient VCE studies because of a higher prevalence of angiodysplastic lesions and findings outside the small bowel.

Citing Articles

Incomplete small bowel capsule endoscopy: Risk factors and cost-effectiveness of real-time viewing.

Topa M, Rimondi A, Sorge A, Smania V, Scaramella L, Nandi N Endosc Int Open. 2024; 12(7):E842-E848.

PMID: 38966319 PMC: 11221906. DOI: 10.1055/a-2333-8002.


Prediction models for recurrence in patients with small bowel bleeding.

Kim J, Nam S World J Clin Cases. 2023; 11(17):3949-3957.

PMID: 37388787 PMC: 10303624. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i17.3949.


High diagnostic yield despite a lower completion rates for inpatient versus outpatient colon and pan-intestinal capsule endoscopy: a nested case-control study.

Deane C, Walker C, Ryan B, OConnor A, ODonnell S, Breslin N BMC Gastroenterol. 2023; 23(1):61.

PMID: 36894909 PMC: 9996940. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02561-x.


Clinical features of capsule endoscopy in young adults: A single-center retrospective study.

Xu H, Chen Y, Wang M, Zhu S JGH Open. 2022; 6(9):637-642.

PMID: 36091324 PMC: 9446405. DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12801.


Inspecting the total gastrointestinal tract by consecutive bidirectional double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with suspected small bowel bleeding.

Zhao L, Yin A, Liao F, Ding Y, Yu H Turk J Gastroenterol. 2020; 31(10):688-694.

PMID: 33169706 PMC: 7659904. DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2020.19387.