» Articles » PMID: 21922026

Examining Implementer Fidelity: Conceptualizing and Measuring Adherence and Competence

Overview
Journal J Child Serv
Date 2011 Sep 17
PMID 21922026
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The large gap between intervention outcomes demonstrated in efficacy trials and the apparent ineffectiveness of these same programs in community settings has prompted investigators and practitioners to look closely at implementation fidelity. Critically important, but often overlooked, are the implementers who deliver evidence-based programs -- the effectiveness of programs cannot surpass skill levels of the people implementing them. This article distinguishes fidelity at the programmatic level from implementer fidelity. Two components of implementer fidelity are defined. Implementer adherence and competence are proposed to be related but unique constructs that can be reliably measured for training¸ monitoring, and outcomes research. Observational measures from a school-based preventive intervention are provided and the unique contributions of implementer adherence and competence are illustrated. Distinguishing implementer adherence to the manual and competence in program delivery is a critical next step in child mental health program implementation research.

Citing Articles

Scoping review of fidelity strategies used in behaviour change trials delivered in primary dental care settings.

Lowers V, Kirby R, Young B, Harris R Trials. 2024; 25(1):824.

PMID: 39695740 PMC: 11653899. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08659-9.


Positive Attitude Upper Middle School social and emotional learning program: influences of implementation quality on program outcome.

Coelho V, Marchante M, Bras P Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1172517.

PMID: 37265944 PMC: 10229836. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1172517.


Fidelity to the ACT SMART Toolkit: an instrumental case study of implementation strategy fidelity.

Tschida J, Drahota A Implement Sci Commun. 2023; 4(1):52.

PMID: 37194052 PMC: 10189967. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00434-2.


A consultation with feedback approach to supporting fidelity to a peer-delivered intervention for posttraumatic stress disorder.

Valentine S, Smith A, Stewart K, Vo L, Lisle I Implement Res Pract. 2023; 2:26334895211017280.

PMID: 37090008 PMC: 9978629. DOI: 10.1177/26334895211017280.


Individual and contextual factors affect the implementation fidelity of youth-friendly services, northwest Ethiopia: A multilevel analysis.

Habitu Y, Biks G, Worku A, Gelaye K PLoS One. 2022; 17(2):e0263733.

PMID: 35143579 PMC: 8830631. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263733.


References
1.
Harachi T, Abbott R, Catalano R, Haggerty K, Fleming C . Opening the black box: using process evaluation measures to assess implementation and theory building. Am J Community Psychol. 2000; 27(5):711-31. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022194005511. View

2.
Carroll K, Nich C, Sifry R, Nuro K, Frankforter T, Ball S . A general system for evaluating therapist adherence and competence in psychotherapy research in the addictions. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000; 57(3):225-38. DOI: 10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00049-6. View

3.
Hill L, Maucione K, Hood B . A focused approach to assessing program fidelity. Prev Sci. 2006; 8(1):25-34. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-006-0051-4. View

4.
Davidson K, Scott J, Schmidt U, Tata P, Thornton S, Tyrer P . Therapist competence and clinical outcome in the Prevention of Parasuicide by Manual Assisted Cognitive Behaviour Therapy trial: the POPMACT study. Psychol Med. 2004; 34(5):855-63. DOI: 10.1017/s0033291703001855. View

5.
Snyder J, Reid J, Stoolmiller M, Howe G, Brown H, Dagne G . The role of behavior observation in measurement systems for randomized prevention trials. Prev Sci. 2006; 7(1):43-56. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-005-0020-3. View