» Articles » PMID: 21908030

Prevalence of Fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia Coli Before and Incidence of Acute Bacterial Prostatitis After Prostate Biopsy

Overview
Journal Urology
Specialty Urology
Date 2011 Sep 13
PMID 21908030
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To study the prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli before transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy and prospectively analyze the rates of infective complications after biopsy in patients receiving fluoroquinolone prophylaxis. E. coli is the pathogen most commonly associated with infections after TRUS-guided prostate biopsy, and the prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli is increasing.

Methods: We analyzed the prospective data from 100 patients who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy from April to December 2010. A stool culture was obtained 1 month before biopsy. Patients received 500 mg levofloxacin orally once daily for 3 days, beginning 2 hours before biopsy. All biopsies were performed as outpatient procedures.

Results: Of the 100 patients, 13 (13%) had a stool culture positive for fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli. In 4 (31%) of these 13 patients, acute bacterial prostatitis was detected after TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Of the 87 patients whose stool culture was negative for fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli, none had acute bacterial prostatitis. All 13 infected patients were treated with carbapenems immediately after diagnosis of prostatitis and made a complete recovery.

Conclusion: Prophylactic fluoroquinolone is still effective in preventing acute bacterial prostatitis after TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. The incidence is relatively low in patients with fluoroquinolone-sensitive E. coli. However, the prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli is about 13% in this population. Stool cultures for the detection of fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli might be obtained before TRUS-guided prostate biopsy.

Citing Articles

Molecular mechanisms impact on fluoroquinolone resistance among E.coli from enteric carriage monitoring before prostate biopsy and earliest description of qnrB81.

Amel R, Abderrazek B, Sana F, Ahmed S, Mariem Z, Lamia K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29324.

PMID: 39592650 PMC: 11599381. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77844-2.


Antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol based on rectal swab culture before prostate biopsy to prevent infectious complications: a prospective randomized comparative study.

Bouzouita A, Rehaiem A, Saadi A, Zaghbib S, Chakroun M, Ayed H Int Urol Nephrol. 2024; 56(8):2495-2502.

PMID: 38448785 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-03998-7.


Protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial assessing transperineal prostate biopsy to reduce infectiouscomplications.

Hu J, Zhu A, Vickers A, Allaf M, Ehdaie B, Schaeffer A BMJ Open. 2023; 13(5):e071191.

PMID: 37208135 PMC: 10201229. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071191.


Colonization With Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Enterobacterales Decreases the Effectiveness of Fluoroquinolone Prophylaxis in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients.

Satlin M, Chen L, Douglass C, Hovan M, Davidson E, Soave R Clin Infect Dis. 2021; 73(7):1257-1265.

PMID: 33956965 PMC: 8492119. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab404.


Cefixime versus prulifloxacin as a prophylactic treatment for prostate biopsy: a randomized study.

Samarinas M, Skriapas K, Mitsogiannis I, Gravas S, Karatzas A, Tzortzis V Cent European J Urol. 2021; 73(4):544-550.

PMID: 33552582 PMC: 7848831. DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2020.0072.