» Articles » PMID: 21902941

Laparoscopic Transhiatal Esophagectomy at a Low-volume Center

Overview
Journal JSLS
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2011 Sep 10
PMID 21902941
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer is associated with a high rate of morbidity, even in specialized centers. Minimally invasive esophageal resection has become increasingly feasible and is gaining popularity in some high-volume institutions. This study assesses the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy performed by a single surgeon at a single low-volume institution over a 20-month period.

Methods: Over the study period, 16 patients underwent laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy. All patients were men with an average age of 70 years (range, 50 to 81).

Results: Two patients required intraoperative conversion to alternative surgical techniques, 1 to an Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and 1 to an open transhiatal approach. Average operative time was 198 minutes (range, 147 to 303). Mean hospital stay was 16.7 days (range, 9 to 30). The average number of resected lymph nodes was 11.7, and 2 patients had benign pathology. No deaths occurred in the 30-day postoperative period.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy is an advanced laparoscopic procedure that can be performed with equivalent morbidity and mortality by a low-volume surgeon in a low-volume center with results comparable to those of high-volume centers. While several authors have demonstrated a correlation between lower mortality rates and high-volume esophagectomy hospitals, our results support surgeon experience as more important than the absolute number of procedures performed each year.

Citing Articles

Minimally invasive surgery for gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Current evidence and future perspectives.

Birla R, Hoara P, Achim F, Dinca V, Ciuc D, Constantinoiu S World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023; 15(10):1675-1690.

PMID: 37969407 PMC: 10631441. DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i10.1675.


Outcomes following laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Cash J, Zehetner J, Hedayati B, Bildzukewicz N, Katkhouda N, Mason R Surg Endosc. 2013; 28(2):492-9.

PMID: 24100862 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3230-y.


Bariatric surgery in the Caribbean: is it safe in a low-volume, third world setting?.

Dan D, Singh Y, Naraynsingh V, Hariharan S, Maharaj R, Teelucksingh S Minim Invasive Surg. 2012; 2012:427803.

PMID: 22645677 PMC: 3356937. DOI: 10.1155/2012/427803.

References
1.
Parameswaran R, Veeramootoo D, Krishnadas R, Cooper M, Berrisford R, Wajed S . Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection. World J Surg. 2009; 33(9):1868-75. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0116-1. View

2.
Dimick J, Wainess R, Upchurch Jr G, Iannettoni M, Orringer M . National trends in outcomes for esophageal resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004; 79(1):212-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.044. View

3.
Enestvedt C, Perry K, Kim C, McConnell P, Diggs B, Vernon A . Trends in the management of esophageal carcinoma based on provider volume: treatment practices of 618 esophageal surgeons. Dis Esophagus. 2009; 23(2):136-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.00985.x. View

4.
Birkmeyer J, Stukel T, Siewers A, Goodney P, Wennberg D, Lucas F . Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(22):2117-27. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa035205. View

5.
Orringer M, Marshall B, Iannettoni M . Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg. 1999; 230(3):392-400; discussion 400-3. PMC: 1420884. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199909000-00012. View