» Articles » PMID: 21902517

Urologic Robot-assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery Using a Homemade Single-port Device: a Single-center Experience of 68 Cases

Overview
Journal J Endourol
Publisher Mary Ann Liebert
Date 2011 Sep 10
PMID 21902517
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To describe our experience with robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (R-LESS) surgeries and evaluate a homemade port system as an effective access technique.

Patients And Methods: Between May 2009 and April 2010, 68 consecutive R- LESS urologic operations were performed in our institution. A 4 to 5 cm long incision was made over the umbilicus. After the inner ring of the Alexis wound retractor was placed into the peritoneum, a common size 7 surgical glove was then applied over the external side of the wound retractor. A homemade single port was established by inserting two 12-mm trocars and two 8-mm trocars through fingers of a surgical glove and securing it to the port.

Results: Sixty-eight patients underwent R-LESS, including partial nephrectomy in 51, nephroureterectomy in 12, radical nephrectomy and adrenalectomy in 2 each, and simple nephrectomy in 1. Mean patient age was 56 years (range 16-81 y). Mean body mass index was 23.9 kg/m(2) (range 17.2-32.9 kg/m(2)). The mean operative time was 219 minutes (range 109-382 min). Mean estimated blood loss 319 mL (range 50-1550 mL), and change in hematocrit was 5.2 % (range 0.0-14.8%). At a mean follow-up of 8 months, there were no port-related complications, and cosmesis was excellent.

Conclusions: R-LESS is feasible and can be safely applied to a variety of urologic operations, considering the low intraoperative complication rate. Our homemade single-port device provides adequate range of motion and is more flexible in port placement for R-LESS than the current multichannel port.

Citing Articles

Robotic nephroureterectomy supplanting open and laparoscopic approach for upper tract urothelial carcinoma management: a narrative review.

Zuluaga L, Rich J, Razdan S, Ucpinar B, Okhawere K, Saini I Transl Androl Urol. 2023; 12(11):1740-1752.

PMID: 38106688 PMC: 10719770. DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-73.


Early perioperative outcomes of single-port compared to multi-port robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Mehrazin R, Ranti D, Altschuler J J Robot Surg. 2023; 17(5):2409-2414.

PMID: 37432590 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01617-8.


Single-port robotic partial nephrectomy: impact on perioperative outcomes and hospital stay.

Carbonara U, Amparore D, Borregales L, Calio A, Ciccarese C, Diana P Ther Adv Urol. 2023; 15:17562872231172834.

PMID: 37325290 PMC: 10265377. DOI: 10.1177/17562872231172834.


Single-port technique evolution and current practice in urologic procedures.

Moschovas M, Bhat K, Onol F, Rogers T, Ogaya-Pinies G, Roof S Asian J Urol. 2021; 8(1):100-104.

PMID: 33569276 PMC: 7859361. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2020.05.003.


Robotic surgical systems in urology: What is currently available?.

Koukourikis P, Rha K Investig Clin Urol. 2020; 62(1):14-22.

PMID: 33381927 PMC: 7801159. DOI: 10.4111/icu.20200387.