» Articles » PMID: 21899752

Methods to Recognize Work-related Cancer in Workplaces, the General Population, and by Experts in the Clinic, a Norwegian Experience

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2011 Sep 9
PMID 21899752
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In most countries, the numbers of work-related cancer identified are much lower than are the estimated total burden of cancer caused by exposure at work. Therefore, there is a great need to use all available practical as well as epidemiological methods for identification as well as to develop new methods of recognizing cases of work-related cancers.

Methods: Primarily based on practical experiences from Norway, methods to identify cases of possible work-related cancers in the general population and at workplaces as well as methods to recognize more specific cases after referral to specialized clinics are reviewed in this publication.

Results: Countries applying a number of the available methods to detect work-related cancer reach a reporting rate of 60 such cases per million, while other countries that do not employ such methods hardly identify any cases. As most subjects previously exposed to cancer causing agents and substances at work are gradually recruited out of work, methods should be versatile for identification of cases in the general population, as well as at work.

Conclusions: Even in countries using a number of the available methods for identification, only a limited fraction of the real number of work-related cancer are notified to the labour inspectorate. Clinicians should be familiar with the methods and do the best to identify work-related cancer to serve prevention.

Citing Articles

Clustering of malignant pleural mesothelioma in asbestos factories: a subgroup analysis in a 29-year follow-up study to identify high-risk industries in Taiwan.

Lee L, Lin C, Pan C, Cheng Y, Chang Y, Liou S BMJ Open. 2018; 8(12):e021063.

PMID: 30530573 PMC: 6303649. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021063.


Impact of work-related cancers in Taiwan-Estimation with QALY (quality-adjusted life year) and healthcare costs.

Lee L, Lin C, Hung M, Wang J Prev Med Rep. 2016; 4:87-93.

PMID: 27413666 PMC: 4929078. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.05.015.

References
1.
Rushton L, Hutchings S, Brown T . The burden of cancer at work: estimation as the first step to prevention. Occup Environ Med. 2007; 65(12):789-800. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2007.037002. View

2.
Chen Y, Chang J, Liao C, Wang H, Yen T, Chiu C . Head and neck cancer in the betel quid chewing area: recent advances in molecular carcinogenesis. Cancer Sci. 2008; 99(8):1507-14. PMC: 11159516. DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00863.x. View

3.
ENTERLINE P, Hartley J, Henderson V . Asbestos and cancer: a cohort followed up to death. Br J Ind Med. 1987; 44(6):396-401. PMC: 1007840. DOI: 10.1136/oem.44.6.396. View

4.
Morfeld P . Years of Life Lost due to exposure: Causal concepts and empirical shortcomings. Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2004; 1(1):5. PMC: 545055. DOI: 10.1186/1742-5573-1-5. View

5.
Hilt B, Lien J, Lund-Larsen P, Lund K, Langard S . Asbestos-related findings in chest radiographs of the male population of the county of Telemark, Norway--a cross-sectional study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1986; 12(6):567-73. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.2105. View