Non-verbal Number Acuity Correlates with Symbolic Mathematics Achievement: but Only in Children

Overview

Journal Psychon Bull Rev

Specialty Psychology

Date 2011 Sep 8

PMID 21898191

Citations 71

Authors

Matthew Inglis

Nina Attridge

Sophie Batchelor

Camilla Gilmore

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The process by which adults develop competence in symbolic mathematics tasks is poorly understood. Nonhuman animals, human infants, and human adults all form nonverbal representations of the approximate numerosity of arrays of dots and are capable of using these representations to perform basic mathematical operations. Several researchers have speculated that individual differences in the acuity of such nonverbal number representations provide the basis for individual differences in symbolic mathematical competence. Specifically, prior research has found that 14-year-old children's ability to rapidly compare the numerosities of two sets of colored dots is correlated with their mathematics achievements at ages 5-11. In the present study, we demonstrated that although when measured concurrently the same relationship holds in children, it does not hold in adults. We conclude that the association between nonverbal number acuity and mathematics achievement changes with age and that nonverbal number representations do not hold the key to explaining the wide variety of mathematical performance levels in adults.

Citing Articles

Executive Function and young children's Cardinality Principle: the mediating role of the Approximate Number System and the moderating role of age.

Li H, Di H, Duan B, Luo M, Wang Y, Wang Z Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1495489.

PMID: 39606203 PMC: 11600143. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1495489.

Frontoparietal and salience network synchronizations during nonsymbolic magnitude processing predict brain age and mathematical performance in youth.

Ng C, Huang P, Cho Y, Lee P, Liu Y, Chang T Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(11):e26777.

PMID: 39046114 PMC: 11267564. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26777.

Developmental Dyscalculia in Relation to Individual Differences in Mathematical Abilities.

Dowker A Children (Basel). 2024; 11(6).

PMID: 38929203 PMC: 11201520. DOI: 10.3390/children11060623.

Integrated diffusion models for distance effects in number memory.

Ratcliff R Cogn Psychol. 2022; 138:101516.

PMID: 36115086 PMC: 9732934. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101516.

Mathematics and Numerosity but Not Visuo-Spatial Working Memory Correlate with Mathematical Anxiety in Adults.

Maldonado Moscoso P, Castaldi E, Arrighi R, Primi C, Caponi C, Buonincontro S Brain Sci. 2022; 12(4).

PMID: 35447954 PMC: 9029128. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12040422.

References

Barth H, La Mont K, Lipton J, Dehaene S, Kanwisher N, Spelke E . Non-symbolic arithmetic in adults and young children. Cognition. 2005; 98(3):199-222. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.011. View

Durand M, Hulme C, Larkin R, Snowling M . The cognitive foundations of reading and arithmetic skills in 7- to 10-year-olds. J Exp Child Psychol. 2005; 91(2):113-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.01.003. View

Moyer R, Landauer T . Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature. 1967; 215(5109):1519-20. DOI: 10.1038/2151519a0. View

De Smedt B, Verschaffel L, Ghesquiere P . The predictive value of numerical magnitude comparison for individual differences in mathematics achievement. J Exp Child Psychol. 2009; 103(4):469-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.01.010. View

Halberda J, Mazzocco M, Feigenson L . Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature. 2008; 455(7213):665-8. DOI: 10.1038/nature07246. View

Iuculano T, Tang J, Hall C, Butterworth B . Core information processing deficits in developmental dyscalculia and low numeracy. Dev Sci. 2008; 11(5):669-80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00716.x. View

Gilmore C, McCarthy S, Spelke E . Symbolic arithmetic knowledge without instruction. Nature. 2007; 447(7144):589-91. DOI: 10.1038/nature05850. View

Gallistel C, Gelman R . Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition. 1992; 44(1-2):43-74. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90050-r. View

Brannon E, Terrace H . Representation of the numerosities 1-9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2000; 26(1):31-49. DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.26.1.31. View

10.

Mundy E, Gilmore C . Children's mapping between symbolic and nonsymbolic representations of number. J Exp Child Psychol. 2009; 103(4):490-502. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.02.003. View

11.

Gilmore C, Attridge N, Inglis M . Measuring the approximate number system. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011; 64(11):2099-109. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.574710. View

12.

Holloway I, Ansari D . Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: the numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement. J Exp Child Psychol. 2008; 103(1):17-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.04.001. View

13.

Dehaene S . Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition. 1992; 44(1-2):1-42. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90049-n. View

14.

Halberda J, Feigenson L . Developmental change in the acuity of the "Number Sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. Dev Psychol. 2008; 44(5):1457-65. DOI: 10.1037/a0012682. View

15.

Cordes S, Gelman R, Gallistel C, Whalen J . Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002; 8(4):698-707. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196206. View

16.

Pica P, Lemer C, Izard V, Dehaene S . Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science. 2004; 306(5695):499-503. DOI: 10.1126/science.1102085. View