» Articles » PMID: 21892719

Clinical Applications of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion-weighted MR Imaging in Brain Tumours

Overview
Journal Radiol Med
Specialty Radiology
Date 2011 Sep 6
PMID 21892719
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imaging (DSC-PWI) sequence to study brain tumours provides information on the haemodynamic characteristics of the neoplastic tissue. Brain perfusion maps and calculation of perfusion parameters, such as relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and mean transit time (MTT) allow assessment of vascularity and angiogenesis within tumours of the central nervous system (CNS), thus providing additional information to conventional MRI sequences. Although DSC-PWI has long been used, its clinical use in the study of brain tumours in daily clinical practice is still to be defined. The aim of this review was to analyse the application of perfusion MRI in the study of brain tumours by summarising our personal experience and the main results reported in the literature.

Citing Articles

From morphology to single-cell molecules: high-resolution 3D histology in biomedicine.

Xu X, Su J, Zhu R, Li K, Zhao X, Fan J Mol Cancer. 2025; 24(1):63.

PMID: 40033282 PMC: 11874780. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-025-02240-x.


Comparison of Arterial Spin-Labeling and DSC Perfusion MR Imaging in Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Vella S, Lauri J, Grech R AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024; 46(1):178-185.

PMID: 39122472 PMC: 11735421. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8442.


Pre-operative spinal cord perfusion quantified by DSC MRI as a predictor of post-operative prognosis in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Song Q, Wang C, Jiang W, Wang J, Li J, Guo H Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(9):3602-3608.

PMID: 39048843 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08417-0.


Probing the glioma microvasculature: a case series of the comparison between perfusion MRI and intraoperative high-frame-rate ultrafast Doppler ultrasound.

Alafandi A, Tbalvandany S, Arzanforoosh F, Van der Voort S, Incekara F, Verhoef L Eur Radiol Exp. 2024; 8(1):13.

PMID: 38273190 PMC: 10810769. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-023-00406-0.


Perfusion-Weighted Imaging: The Use of a Novel Perfusion Scoring Criteria to Improve the Assessment of Brain Tumor Recurrence versus Treatment Effects.

Sai Mannam S, Nwagwu C, Sumner C, Weinberg B, Hoang K Tomography. 2023; 9(3):1062-1070.

PMID: 37368539 PMC: 10302394. DOI: 10.3390/tomography9030087.


References
1.
Caseiras G, Chheang S, Babb J, Rees J, Pecerrelli N, Tozer D . Relative cerebral blood volume measurements of low-grade gliomas predict patient outcome in a multi-institution setting. Eur J Radiol. 2009; 73(2):215-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.11.005. View

2.
Cha S, Lupo J, Chen M, Lamborn K, McDermott M, Berger M . Differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme and single brain metastasis by peak height and percentage of signal intensity recovery derived from dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 28(6):1078-84. PMC: 8134129. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0484. View

3.
Mitsuya K, Nakasu Y, Horiguchi S, Harada H, Nishimura T, Bando E . Perfusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging to distinguish the recurrence of metastatic brain tumors from radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurooncol. 2010; 99(1):81-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-009-0106-z. View

4.
Lev M, Ozsunar Y, Henson J, Rasheed A, Barest G, Harsh 4th G . Glial tumor grading and outcome prediction using dynamic spin-echo MR susceptibility mapping compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR: confounding effect of elevated rCBV of oligodendrogliomas [corrected]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004; 25(2):214-21. PMC: 7974605. View

5.
Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, Ikushima I, Hirai T, Okuda T . Correlation of MR imaging-determined cerebral blood volume maps with histologic and angiographic determination of vascularity of gliomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 171(6):1479-86. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.171.6.9843274. View