» Articles » PMID: 21887511

Predictive Value of Neurological Examination for Early Cortical Responses to Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Patients with Postanoxic Coma

Overview
Journal J Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Sep 3
PMID 21887511
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bilateral absence of cortical N20 responses of median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) predicts poor neurological outcome in postanoxic coma after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Although SEP is easy to perform and available in most hospitals, it is worthwhile to know how neurological signs are associated with SEP results. The aim of this study was to investigate whether specific clinical neurological signs are associated with either an absent or a present median nerve SEP in patients after CPR. Data from the previously published multicenter prospective cohort study PROPAC (prognosis in postanoxic coma, 2000-2003) were used. Neurological examination, consisting of Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) and brain stem reflexes, and SEP were performed 24, 48, and 72 h after CPR. Positive predictive values for predicting absent and present SEP, as well as diagnostic accuracy were calculated. Data of 407 patients were included. Of the 781 SEPs performed, N20 s were present in 401, bilaterally absent in 299, and 81 SEPs were technically undeterminable. The highest positive predictive values (0.63-0.91) for an absent SEP were found for absent pupillary light responses. The highest positive predictive values (0.71-0.83) for a present SEP were found for motor scores of withdrawal to painful stimuli or better. Multivariate analyses showed a fair diagnostic accuracy (0.78) for neurological examination in predicting an absent or present SEP at 48 or 72 h after CPR. This study shows that neurological examination cannot reliably predict absent or present cortical N20 responses in median nerve SEPs in patients after CPR.

Citing Articles

Recovery and Survival of Patients After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Literature Review Showcasing the Big Picture of Intensive Care Unit-Related Factors.

Nikolovski S, Lazic A, Fiser Z, Obradovic I, Tijanic J, Raffay V Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e54827.

PMID: 38529434 PMC: 10962929. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54827.


The effect of Glibenclamide on somatosensory evoked potentials after cardiac arrest in rats.

Lachance B, Wang Z, Badjatia N, Jia X Neurocrit Care. 2021; 36(2):612-620.

PMID: 34599418 PMC: 8967780. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-021-01350-w.


Evoked and Event-Related Potentials as Biomarkers of Consciousness State and Recovery.

Pruvost-Robieux E, Marchi A, Martinelli I, Bouchereau E, Gavaret M J Clin Neurophysiol. 2021; 39(1):22-31.

PMID: 34474424 PMC: 8715993. DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000762.


Beyond dichotomy: patterns and amplitudes of SSEPs and neurological outcomes after cardiac arrest.

Oh S, Park K, Choi S, Oh J, Kim H, Youn C Crit Care. 2019; 23(1):224.

PMID: 31215475 PMC: 6582536. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2510-x.


Prognostic Value of the Neurological Examination in Cardiac Arrest Patients After Therapeutic Hypothermia.

Matthews E, Magid-Bernstein J, Sobczak E, Velazquez A, Falo C, Park S Neurohospitalist. 2018; 8(2):66-73.

PMID: 29623156 PMC: 5882011. DOI: 10.1177/1941874417733217.


References
1.
Rossetti A, Oddo M, Logroscino G, Kaplan P . Prognostication after cardiac arrest and hypothermia: a prospective study. Ann Neurol. 2010; 67(3):301-7. DOI: 10.1002/ana.21984. View

2.
Madl C, Kramer L, Yeganehfar W, Eisenhuber E, Kranz A, Ratheiser K . Detection of nontraumatic comatose patients with no benefit of intensive care treatment by recording of sensory evoked potentials. Arch Neurol. 1996; 53(6):512-6. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1996.00550060054017. View

3.
Koht A, Schutz W, Schmidt G, Schramm J, Watanabe E . Effects of etomidate, midazolam, and thiopental on median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials and the additive effects of fentanyl and nitrous oxide. Anesth Analg. 1988; 67(5):435-41. View

4.
Scheepstra G, de Lange J, Booij L, Ros H . Median nerve evoked potentials during propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1989; 62(1):92-4. DOI: 10.1093/bja/62.1.92. View

5.
Wijdicks E, Hijdra A, Young G, Bassetti C, Wiebe S . Practice parameter: prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2006; 67(2):203-10. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000227183.21314.cd. View