» Articles » PMID: 21878838

Clinical Utility of Molecular Surveillance for Cytomegalovirus After Antiviral Prophylaxis in High-risk Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Overview
Journal Transplantation
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2011 Sep 1
PMID 21878838
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after discontinuation of prophylaxis is a significant problem for CMV-seronegative recipients of CMV-seropositive organs (donor seropositive and recipient seronegative [D+/R-]). Virologic monitoring after prophylaxis has been proposed as a way to prevent late-onset disease.

Methods: We reviewed the efficacy of this strategy. CMV D+/R- organ transplant recipients received 3 to 6 months of antiviral prophylaxis, and then viral loads were performed weekly for 8 weeks. Preemptive antiviral therapy was initiated at a predefined threshold.

Results: Seventy-one CMV D+/R- patients were assessed. Symptomatic CMV disease occurred in 29 of 71 (40.8%) patients during the first-year posttransplant. A significant portion of disease occurred only after the 8-week surveillance period (n=16). Viremia occurred in 19 of 71 (26.8%) patients during the 8-week surveillance. Preemptive therapy was successfully used in only 3 of 19 (15.8%) viremic patients with no further disease development. The remaining patients cleared low-level viremia spontaneously (n=3) or had CMV disease (n=13) either at the first detection of viremia or before preemptive therapy initiation because of rapid viral load doubling (median doubling time 1.1 days).

Conclusion: CMV D+/R- patients had significant incidence of late-onset disease after prophylaxis. However, the use of a preemptive after prophylaxis strategy was of limited benefit in this group because of rapid viral doubling times and disease occurring after the surveillance period.

Citing Articles

Cytomegalovirus Matching in Deceased Donor Kidney Allocation: Results From a U.S. National Simulation Model.

Sandikci B, Ulukus M, Ergun M, Tanriover B Transplant Direct. 2024; 10(6):e1622.

PMID: 38769987 PMC: 11104729. DOI: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001622.


Patient years lost due to cytomegalovirus serostatus mismatching in the scientific registry of transplant recipients.

Abidi M, Schold J, Kaplan B, Weinberg A, Erlandson K, Malamon J Front Immunol. 2024; 14:1292648.

PMID: 38264645 PMC: 10803440. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1292648.


Updates in Cytomegalovirus Prevention and Treatment in Solid Organ Transplantation.

Doss K, Heldman M, Limaye A Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2023; .

PMID: 37989636 PMC: 11102935. DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2023.10.001.


Importance of miR-UL-148D Expression Pattern in Cytomegalovirus Infected Transplant Patients.

Golshan M, Yaghobi R, Geramizadeh B, Afshari A, Roozbeh J, Malek-Hosseini S Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2022; 12(4):46-54.

PMID: 36570354 PMC: 9758995.


Cytomegalovirus antiviral stewardship in the COVID-19 Era: Increasing complexity of prophylaxis and treatment and potential mitigation strategies.

Jorgenson M, Descourouez J, Wong C, Strayer J, Parajuli S, Rice J Transpl Infect Dis. 2021; 23(4):e13586.

PMID: 33595158 PMC: 7995190. DOI: 10.1111/tid.13586.