» Articles » PMID: 21877235

Two Monitoring Methods of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Mechanical Heart Valve Prothesis: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Date 2011 Aug 31
PMID 21877235
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) with warfarin has become the standard therapy for the patients with mechanical heart valve prothesis. The monitoring method of self-monitoring or self-management was promising to optimize the use of warfarin, but most of previous studies have included patients with various indications of OAT, which made it difficult to extrapolate the results to the specific patient population with mechanical heart valve prostheses. This study was intended to evaluate the new and traditional monitoring methods in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses. Relevant literature finished before Dec. 2010 were searched through a number of digital databases. And then they were pooled by RevMan 4.2 and R 2.13.0 in three fields: rate within the target range, test frequency and occurrence rate of poor events. Five randomized control trials with a total of 2,219 patients were identified. Pooled estimates showed reductions in thromboembolic events (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.35-0.77; P = 0.0012) and all-cause mortality (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.86; P = 0.0115). No difference was noted in major and minor haemorrhage. All trials reported improvements in the mean proportion of international normalized ratios in range. Self-monitoring and self-management can improve the quality of OAT in the patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses. The patients spend more time within the therapeutic range resulting in decreases in thromboembolic events and mortality, with no increase in haemorrhage. However, self-monitoring and self-management was not feasible for all patients, and require identification and education of suitable candidates. The success of self-monitoring and self-management method depends on consistent, regular, and frequent testing.

Citing Articles

[Educational program to improve knowledge and therapeutic range for self-controlled anticoagulated patients].

Romero-Arana A, Gonzalez-Rodriguez M, Sanchez-Vega P, Garcia-Iglesias J, Gomez-Salgado J, Romero A Aten Primaria. 2024; 57(5):103139.

PMID: 39536414 PMC: 11605452. DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2024.103139.


Effectiveness of a self-management program for anticoagulated patients to improve their knowledge about treatment and time in therapeutic range.

Romero-Arana A, Gonzalez-Rodriguez M, Sanchez-Vega P, Gomez-Salgado J, Romero A Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(44):e40258.

PMID: 39495974 PMC: 11537636. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040258.


Follow-up and management of valvular heart disease patients with prosthetic valve: a clinical practice guideline for Indian scenario.

Saksena D, Mishra Y, Muralidharan S, Kanhere V, Srivastava P, Srivastava C Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020; 35(Suppl 1):3-44.

PMID: 33061064 PMC: 7525528. DOI: 10.1007/s12055-019-00789-z.


Technology-Based Interventions in Oral Anticoagulation Management: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Dai H, Zheng C, Lin C, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Chen F J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(7):e18386.

PMID: 32673227 PMC: 7391164. DOI: 10.2196/18386.


Self-management of oral anticoagulation.

Siebenhofer A, Jeitler K, Horvath K, Habacher W, Schmidt L, Semlitsch T Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014; 111(6):83-91.

PMID: 24622604 PMC: 3953995. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0083.

References
1.
Bloomfield P, Wheatley D, Prescott R, Miller H . Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324(9):573-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199102283240901. View

2.
Yacoub M, Takkenberg J . Will heart valve tissue engineering change the world?. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2005; 2(2):60-1. DOI: 10.1038/ncpcardio0112. View

3.
Sun J, Davidson M, Lamy A, Eikelboom J . Antithrombotic management of patients with prosthetic heart valves: current evidence and future trends. Lancet. 2009; 374(9689):565-76. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60780-7. View

4.
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C . Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997; 315(7109):629-34. PMC: 2127453. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629. View

5.
Cobanoglu A, Fessler C, Guvendik L, Grunkemeier G, Starr A . Aortic valve replacement with the Starr-Edwards prosthesis: a comparison of the first and second decades of follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988; 45(3):248-52. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)62458-7. View