» Articles » PMID: 21872499

Low Risk Prostate Cancer in Men ≥ 70 Years Old: to Treat or Not to Treat

Overview
Journal Urol Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2011 Aug 30
PMID 21872499
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Prostate cancer (CaP) in the aging male will become an increasingly important and controversial health care issue. We evaluated the outcomes between a variety of treatments for low-risk CaP in patients 70 years of age and older.

Methods And Materials: A total of 3,650 men diagnosed with CaP between 1989 and 2009 were identified in the Center for Prostate Disease Research database to be 70 years of age or older at time of diagnosis. Of these patients, 770 men met the D'Amico criteria ([13]) for low-risk disease and were treated with radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or watchful waiting. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare clinicopathologic features across treatment groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare biochemical recurrence-free, progression-free, and overall survival.

Results: Of the 770 patient cohort, 194 (25%) chose radical prostatectomy, 252 (33%) chose external beam radiation therapy, and 324 (42%) were initially managed by watchful waiting with 110 (34%) of this subset ultimately undergoing secondary treatment. The median follow-up was 6.4 years. There were no significant differences in distributions of race/ethnicity, number of medical comorbidities, or clinical stage across the treatment groups. Patients managed on watchful waiting without secondary treatment had the poorest overall survival on Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = 0.0001). Additionally, multivariate analysis confirmed this result for watchful waiting without secondary treatment as being a statistically significant predictor of overall mortality (HR 1.938, P = 0.0084).

Citing Articles

The Latest Data Specifically Focused on Long-Term Oncologic Prognostication for Very Old Adults with Acute Vulnerable Localized Prostate Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Wu S, Effendi F, Canales R, Huang C J Clin Med. 2022; 11(12).

PMID: 35743522 PMC: 9225393. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123451.


A comparison of the survival outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy in patients over 75 years old with non-metastatic prostate cancer: A Korean multicenter study.

Ko Y, Park S, Ha U, Joung J, Jeong S, Byun S Investig Clin Urol. 2021; 62(5):535-544.

PMID: 34387037 PMC: 8421997. DOI: 10.4111/icu.20210079.


How to choose proper local treatment in men aged ≥75 years with cT2 localized prostate cancer?.

Jin K, Qiu S, Li J, Zheng X, Tu X, Liao X Cancer Med. 2019; 8(7):3370-3378.

PMID: 31066510 PMC: 6601593. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2221.


Individual and Population Comparisons of Surgery and Radiotherapy Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Using Bayesian Multistate Models.

Beesley L, Morgan T, Spratt D, Singhal U, Feng F, Furgal A JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2(2):e187765.

PMID: 30707231 PMC: 6484613. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7765.


Evaluation and Management of the Geriatric Urologic Oncology Patient.

McKibben M, Smith A Curr Geriatr Rep. 2015; 4(1):7-15.

PMID: 25678987 PMC: 4321682. DOI: 10.1007/s13670-014-0106-5.