» Articles » PMID: 21866369

PEEP-induced Changes in Lung Volume in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Two Methods to Estimate Alveolar Recruitment

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2011 Aug 26
PMID 21866369
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Lung volumes, especially functional residual capacity (FRC), are decreased in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) contributes to increased end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and to improved oxygenation, but differentiating recruitment of previously nonaerated lung units from distension of previously open lung units remains difficult. This study evaluated simple methods derived from bedside EELV measurements to assess PEEP-induced lung recruitment while monitoring strain.

Methods: Prospective multicenter study in 30 mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS in five university hospital ICUs. Two PEEP levels were studied, each for 45 min, and EELV (nitrogen washout/washin technique) was measured at both levels, with the difference (Δ) reflecting PEEP-induced lung volume changes. Alveolar recruitment was measured using pressure-volume (PV) curves. High and low recruiters were separated based on median recruitment at high PEEP. Minimum predicted increase in lung volume computed as the product of ΔPEEP by static compliance was subtracted from ΔEELV as an independent estimate of recruitment. Estimated and measured recruitments were compared. Strain induced by PEEP was also calculated from the same measurements.

Results: FRC was 31 ± 11% of predicted. Median [25th-75th percentiles] PEEP-induced recruitment was 272 [187-355] mL. Estimated recruitment correlated with recruited volume measured on PV curves (ρ = 0.68), with a slope close to identity. The ΔEELV/FRC ratio differentiated high from low recruiters (110 [76-135] vs. 55 [23-70]%, p = 0.001). Strain increase due to PEEP was larger in high recruiters (p = 0.002).

Conclusion: PEEP-induced recruitment and strain can be assessed at the bedside using EELV measurement. We describe two bedside methods for predicting low or high alveolar recruitment during ARDS.

Citing Articles

Assessment of recruitment from CT to the bedside: challenges and future directions.

Giovanazzi S, Nocera D, Catozzi G, Collino F, Cressoni M, Ball L Crit Care. 2025; 29(1):64.

PMID: 39915886 PMC: 11800554. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-025-05263-4.


Bedside Assessment of the Respiratory System During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.

Giosa L, Collins P, Shetty S, Lubian M, Del Signore R, Chioccola M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685913 PMC: 11642134. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237456.


Transpulmonary pressure monitoring in critically ill patients: pros and cons-correction of description of the non-invasive PEEP-step method for separation of lung and chest wall mechanics.

Stenqvist O Crit Care. 2024; 28(1):355.

PMID: 39497170 PMC: 11533304. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05125-5.


Respiratory Effects of Maximal Lung Recruitment Maneuvers Using Single-Breath Estimation in ARDS.

Lhermitte A, Pugliesi E, Cerasuolo D, Delcampe A, Cabart A, Du Cheyron D Respir Care. 2024; 69(12):1499-1507.

PMID: 39438062 PMC: 11572990. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.11948.


Recruitment-to-inflation ratio reflects the impact of peep on dynamic lung strain in a highly recruitable model of ARDS.

Murgolo F, Grieco D, Spadaro S, Bartolomeo N, Di Mussi R, Pisani L Ann Intensive Care. 2024; 14(1):106.

PMID: 38963617 PMC: 11224186. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-024-01343-w.


References
1.
Gattinoni L, Pesenti A . The concept of "baby lung". Intensive Care Med. 2005; 31(6):776-84. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-005-2627-z. View

2.
Rouby J, Puybasset L, Nieszkowska A, Lu Q . Acute respiratory distress syndrome: lessons from computed tomography of the whole lung. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31(4 Suppl):S285-95. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000057905.74813.BC. View

3.
Richard J, Brochard L, Vandelet P, Breton L, Maggiore S, Jonson B . Respective effects of end-expiratory and end-inspiratory pressures on alveolar recruitment in acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31(1):89-92. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200301000-00014. View

4.
Lu Q, Vieira S, Richecoeur J, Puybasset L, Kalfon P, Coriat P . A simple automated method for measuring pressure-volume curves during mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999; 159(1):275-82. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.9802082. View

5.
Chiumello D, Carlesso E, Cadringher P, Caironi P, Valenza F, Polli F . Lung stress and strain during mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008; 178(4):346-55. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200710-1589OC. View