» Articles » PMID: 21862825

The Nocebo Effect and Its Relevance for Clinical Practice

Overview
Journal Psychosom Med
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2011 Aug 25
PMID 21862825
Citations 128
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Negative expectations deriving from the clinical encounter can produce negative outcomes, known as nocebo effects. Specifically, research on the nocebo effect indicates that information disclosure about potential side effects can itself contribute to producing adverse effects. Neurobiological processes play a role in the nocebo effect, and this article provides a selective review of mechanistic research on the nocebo effect. Comparatively little attention has been directed to clinical studies and their implications for daily clinical practice. The nocebo response is influenced by the content and the way information is presented to patients in clinical trials in both the placebo and active treatment conditions. Nocebo effects adversely influence quality of life and therapy adherence, emphasizing the need for minimizing these responses to the extent possible. Evidence further indicates that the informed consent process in clinical trials may induce nocebo effects. This article concludes with ethical directions for future patient-oriented research and routine practice.

Citing Articles

Optimized communication during risk disclosure to reduce nocebo headache after lumbar puncture-a study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Asan L, Gronen J, Peters L, Kleinschnitz C, Holle-Lee D, Benson S Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1521978.

PMID: 40078436 PMC: 11897036. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1521978.


Perspectives of People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Towards a Decision Aid Assessing Preferences of Glucose-Lowering Drugs: The Dilemma of Choosing.

Roldan Munoz S, Mol P, de Vries F, van Dijk P, Hillege H, Postmus D Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025; 19:215-234.

PMID: 39882148 PMC: 11776401. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S486553.


The Two Sides of Placebo Analgesia: Differential Functional Connectivity Reveals Mechanisms of Placebo Analgesic Response.

Bush N, Cushnie A, Boissoneault J, Aghabeigi S, Alexander C, Staud R J Pain Res. 2025; 18():189-201.

PMID: 39816204 PMC: 11733195. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S483157.


Identifying the psychological effects of nocebo education: results from two pre-registered experiments.

Gorner K, Spotts E, Geers A J Behav Med. 2024; 47(6):1080-1093.

PMID: 39306633 PMC: 11499334. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-024-00520-3.


Communication in the ICU: An Unintended Nocebo Effect?.

Guiance I, Wallace L, Varga K, Niven A, Hosey M, Chitulangoma J J Patient Exp. 2024; 11:23743735241272148.

PMID: 39130130 PMC: 11311157. DOI: 10.1177/23743735241272148.


References
1.
Lamont E, Christakis N . Complexities in prognostication in advanced cancer: "to help them live their lives the way they want to". JAMA. 2003; 290(1):98-104. DOI: 10.1001/jama.290.1.98. View

2.
Kaplan S, Greenfield S, Ware Jr J . Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989; 27(3 Suppl):S110-27. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00010. View

3.
Stovner L, Oftedal G, Straume A, Johnsson A . Nocebo as headache trigger: evidence from a sham-controlled provocation study with RF fields. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2008; 188:67-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2008.01035.x. View

4.
Stockhorst U, Wiener J, Klosterhalfen S, Klosterhalfen W, Aul C, Steingruber H . Effects of overshadowing on conditioned nausea in cancer patients: an experimental study. Physiol Behav. 1998; 64(5):743-53. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(98)00135-8. View

5.
Enck P, Benedetti F, Schedlowski M . New insights into the placebo and nocebo responses. Neuron. 2008; 59(2):195-206. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.06.030. View