» Articles » PMID: 21862288

A Fully Automated Trabecular Bone Structural Analysis Tool Based on T2* -weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2011 Aug 25
PMID 21862288
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One major source affecting the precision of bone structure analysis in quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) is inter- and intraoperator variability, inherent in delineating and tracing regions of interest along longitudinal studies. In this paper an automated analysis tool, featuring bone marrow segmentation, region of interest generation, and characterization of cancellous bone of articular joints is presented. In evaluation studies conducted at the knee joint the novel analysis tool significantly decreased the standard error of measurement and improved the sensitivity in detecting minor structural changes. It further eliminated the need of time-consuming user interaction, and thereby increasing reproducibility.

Citing Articles

Architecture of the cancellous bone in human proximal tibia based on P45 sectional plastinated specimens.

Sun S, Jiang W, Song T, Chi Y, Xu Q, Liu C Surg Radiol Anat. 2021; 43(12):2055-2069.

PMID: 34642771 DOI: 10.1007/s00276-021-02826-2.


Optimisation of three-dimensional lower jaw resection margin planning using a novel Black Bone magnetic resonance imaging protocol.

Hoving A, Kraeima J, Schepers R, Dijkstra H, Potze J, Dorgelo B PLoS One. 2018; 13(4):e0196059.

PMID: 29677217 PMC: 5909900. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196059.

References
1.
Messent E, Ward R, Tonkin C, Buckland-Wright C . Differences in trabecular structure between knees with and without osteoarthritis quantified by macro and standard radiography, respectively. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006; 14(12):1302-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.07.012. View

2.
Yezzi Jr A, Kichenassamy S, Kumar A, Olver P, Tannenbaum A . A geometric snake model for segmentation of medical imagery. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1997; 16(2):199-209. DOI: 10.1109/42.563665. View

3.
Fripp J, Crozier S, Warfield S, Ourselin S . Automatic segmentation of the bone and extraction of the bone-cartilage interface from magnetic resonance images of the knee. Phys Med Biol. 2007; 52(6):1617-31. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/6/005. View

4.
Lindsey C, Narasimhan A, Adolfo J, Jin H, Steinbach L, Link T . Magnetic resonance evaluation of the interrelationship between articular cartilage and trabecular bone of the osteoarthritic knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004; 12(2):86-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2003.10.009. View

5.
Bauer J, Link T . Advances in osteoporosis imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2009; 71(3):440-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.04.064. View