» Articles » PMID: 21860736

Quality of Life in Gynecologic Cancer Survivors Compared to Healthy Check-up Women

Overview
Journal J Gynecol Oncol
Date 2011 Aug 24
PMID 21860736
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to compare quality of life of disease-free patients after therapy for gynecologic malignancies at follow-up in comparison with healthy check-up patients. Our second objective was to assess correlation between demographic data, disease and treatment factors and quality of life scores.

Methods: Patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) quality of life questionnaire at least 6 months after treatment for a gynecologic malignancy. Responses were compared to unmatched healthy women who were seen for standard gynecologic screening examinations. Statistical calculation was done using chi-squared tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis and Spearman rank correlations. Factors associated with FACT-G scores were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: Eight hundred and seventy patients were recruited. The median time since therapy was 61 months (range, 6 to 173 months). The overall FACT-G scores were higher in the patient group than in the healthy group (p<0.05). The scores of each subscale measuring physical, functional, social/family and emotional well-being were also higher in the patient group (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed correlation between Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, educational level, care giver, presence of economic problems and FACT-G scores.

Conclusion: The quality of life scores were higher in gynecologic cancer patients after treatment. And the factors that associated with the higher score in the patient group are having husband as a caregiver, no financial problem, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score 0 or 1 and having high school or higher education.

Citing Articles

Sex differences of the association between handgrip strength and health-related quality of life among patients with cancer.

Kim J, Kim Y, Oh J, Lee S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):9876.

PMID: 38684776 PMC: 11059168. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60710-6.


Psychometric validation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endometrial among endometrial cancer patients.

Kim S, Noh J, Kim Y, Cho J, Kang D, Lee Y Cancer Med. 2024; 13(5):e7096.

PMID: 38466031 PMC: 10926879. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7096.


The Impact of Spiritual Well-Being on the Quality of Life of Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Jetan M, Daifallah A, Rabayaa M, Qadri R, Nassorah M, Nouri A Integr Cancer Ther. 2023; 22:15347354231210841.

PMID: 37961876 PMC: 10647945. DOI: 10.1177/15347354231210841.


Objective and Subjective Appetite Assessment in Patients with Gynecological Cancer: A Pre- and Post-Operative Pilot Study.

Gounitsioti I, Poulimeneas D, Grammatikopoulou M, Kotzamanidis C, Gkiouras K, Nigdelis M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(16).

PMID: 36011958 PMC: 9408329. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191610322.


Surviving and thriving: What do survivors of gynecologic cancer want?.

Peerenboom R, Ackroyd S, Chang C, Moore E, Vogel T, Lippitt M Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022; 41:101011.

PMID: 35663850 PMC: 9160655. DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101011.


References
1.
Awadalla A, Ohaeri J, Gholoum A, Khalid A, Hamad H, Jacob A . Factors associated with quality of life of outpatients with breast cancer and gynecologic cancers and their family caregivers: a controlled study. BMC Cancer. 2007; 7:102. PMC: 1925112. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-102. View

2.
Greimel E, Thiel I, Peintinger F, Cegnar I, PONGRATZ E . Prospective assessment of quality of life of female cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2002; 85(1):140-7. DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2002.6586. View

3.
Miller B, Pittman B, Case D, McQuellon R . Quality of life after treatment for gynecologic malignancies: a pilot study in an outpatient clinic. Gynecol Oncol. 2002; 87(2):178-84. DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2002.6812. View

4.
Tahmasebi M, Yarandi F, Eftekhar Z, Montazeri A, Namazi H . Quality of life in gynecologic cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008; 8(4):591-2. View

5.
Carver C, Scheier M . Scaling back goals and recalibration of the affect system are processes in normal adaptive self-regulation: understanding 'response shift' phenomena. Soc Sci Med. 2000; 50(12):1715-22. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00412-8. View