» Articles » PMID: 21859821

Outcomes of Research Biopsies in Phase I Clinical Trials: the MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience

Overview
Journal Oncologist
Specialty Oncology
Date 2011 Aug 24
PMID 21859821
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Research biopsies are crucial for exploring the impact of novel agents on putative targets. The current study assesses the safety and success rate associated with performing such biopsies.

Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 155 consecutive patients who had one or more research biopsies as part of a phase I trial from September 2004 to October 2009.

Results: Of 281 research biopsies performed, 118 were paired before and after treatment biopsies (total = 236 biopsies). The most common sites of biopsy were superficial lymph node (19.9%), followed by liver (16.4%), and then soft tissue (15.7%). Ultrasound-guided biopsies were the most frequent type (53.7%). Among 142 patients who consented for mandatory biopsy, 86.6% had the biopsy performed, compared with 4.4% of 911 patients offered a biopsy on an optional basis (p < .0001). Biopsy was obtained most frequently on industry-sponsored trials; lack of funding on nonindustry trials was the most common reason that biopsies were not obtained. Of 281 single biopsies, only 4 (1.4%) had complications: pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement (n = 2), infection requiring admission (n = 1), and arrhythmia with hypotension (n = 1). All but one biopsy was successful in obtaining tissue. No deaths were attributable to biopsy.

Conclusions: Our experience demonstrates that research biopsies in early phase clinical trials are safe (1.4% risk of serious complications), and a higher percentage of patients underwent mandatory biopsies (86.6%) compared with that of the patients with optional biopsies (4.4%).

Citing Articles

Cancer cell plasticity: from cellular, molecular, and genetic mechanisms to tumor heterogeneity and drug resistance.

Bhat G, Sethi I, Sadida H, Rah B, Mir R, Algehainy N Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2024; 43(1):197-228.

PMID: 38329598 PMC: 11016008. DOI: 10.1007/s10555-024-10172-z.


Current studies and future directions for medulloblastoma: A review from the pacific pediatric neuro-oncology consortium (PNOC) disease working group.

Cooney T, Lindsay H, Leary S, Wechsler-Reya R Neoplasia. 2022; 35:100861.

PMID: 36516489 PMC: 9755363. DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2022.100861.


MRI Radiogenomics in Precision Oncology: New Diagnosis and Treatment Method.

Yin X, Gao M, Wang W, Zhang Y Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022; 2022:2703350.

PMID: 35845886 PMC: 9282990. DOI: 10.1155/2022/2703350.


Practical consideration for successful sequential tumor biopsies in first-in-human trials.

Koyama T, Shimizu T, Sato J, Katsuya Y, Iwasa S, Kondo S Invest New Drugs. 2022; 40(4):841-849.

PMID: 35404018 PMC: 9288361. DOI: 10.1007/s10637-022-01236-4.


Variability in biopsy quality informs translational research applications in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Weinfurtner K, Cho J, Ackerman D, Chen J, Woodard A, Li W Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):22763.

PMID: 34815453 PMC: 8611010. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02093-6.


References
1.
Flaherty K, Puzanov I, Kim K, Ribas A, McArthur G, Sosman J . Inhibition of mutated, activated BRAF in metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(9):809-19. PMC: 3724529. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002011. View

2.
Le Tourneau C, Lee J, Siu L . Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009; 101(10):708-20. PMC: 2684552. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp079. View

3.
Horstmann E, McCabe M, Grochow L, Yamamoto S, Rubinstein L, Budd T . Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(9):895-904. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa042220. View

4.
Chabner B . New results will change the paradigm for phase I trials and drug approval. Oncologist. 2010; 15(10):1023-5. PMC: 3227892. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0267. View

5.
Helft P, Daugherty C . Are we taking without giving in return? The ethics of research-related biopsies and the benefits of clinical trial participation. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(30):4793-5. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.7125. View