» Articles » PMID: 21858076

Adherence of Pharmaceutical Advertisements in Medical Journals to FDA Guidelines and Content for Safe Prescribing

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2011 Aug 23
PMID 21858076
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Physician-directed pharmaceutical advertising is regulated in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA); adherence to current FDA guidelines is unknown. Our objective was to determine adherence rates of physician-directed print advertisements in biomedical journals to FDA guidelines and describe content important for safe prescribing.

Methods And Findings: Cross-sectional analysis of November 2008 pharmaceutical advertisements within top U.S.-based biomedical journals publishing original research. We excluded advertisements for devices, over the counter medications, and disease awareness. We utilized FDA guideline items identifying unique forms of advertisement bias to categorize advertisements as adherent to FDA guidelines, possibly non-adherent to at least 1 item, or non-adherent to at least 1 item. We also evaluated advertisement content important for safe prescribing, including benefit quantification, risk information and verifiable references. All advertisements were evaluated by 2 or more investigators, with differences resolved by discussion. Twelve journals met inclusion criteria. Nine contained pharmaceutical advertisements, including 192 advertisements for 82 unique products; median 2 per product (range 1-14). Six "teaser" advertisements presented only drug names, leaving 83 full unique advertisements. Fifteen advertisements (18.1%) adhered to all FDA guidelines, 41 (49.4%) were non-adherent with at least one form of FDA-described bias, and 27 (32.5%) were possibly non-adherent due to incomplete information. Content important for safe prescribing was often incomplete; 57.8% of advertisements did not quantify serious risks, 48.2% lacked verifiable references and 28.9% failed to present adequate efficacy quantification. Study limitations included its focus on advertisements from a single month, the subjectivity of FDA guidelines themselves, and the necessary subjectivity of determinations of adherence.

Conclusions: Few physician-directed print pharmaceutical advertisements adhere to all FDA guidelines; over half fail to quantify serious risks. The FDA could better protect public health by creating new more objective advertisement guidelines requiring transparent presentation of basic safety and efficacy information.

Citing Articles

The Invisible Hand of Industry.

Guo X, Barber E Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 65(2):260-267.

PMID: 35476619 PMC: 9060382. DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000697.


An investigation into the pharmaceutical advertising in Iranian medical journals.

Yousefi N, Sharif Z, Chahian F, Mombeini T, Peiravian F J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022; 15(1):18.

PMID: 35255995 PMC: 8900423. DOI: 10.1186/s40545-022-00415-1.


Knowledge, Information Sources, and Institutional Trust of Patients Regarding Medication Use in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.

Kirubarajan A, Lam A, Yu A, Taheri C, Khan S, Sethuram C J Family Reprod Health. 2021; 15(3):160-171.

PMID: 34721607 PMC: 8536826. DOI: 10.18502/jfrh.v15i3.7133.


The Impact of Direct-to-Consumer Pharmaceutical Advertising on Public Knowledge of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Study on Over-the-Counter Proton Pump Inhibitors.

AlShammari M, Assiri G, Bin Buraykan M, Almogbel Y, Arafah A, Bashatah A Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020; 14:635-642.

PMID: 32256054 PMC: 7093092. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S245391.


Off the Market: The Percentage of Products Available After Ten Years.

Smith E, Miller J, LeRoy T, Ingall E, Tybor D, Martin J J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018; 2(1):e076.

PMID: 30211376 PMC: 6132318. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00076.


References
1.
Gagnon M, Lexchin J . The cost of pushing pills: a new estimate of pharmaceutical promotion expenditures in the United States. PLoS Med. 2008; 5(1):e1. PMC: 2174966. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050001. View

2.
Wilkes M, Doblin B, Shapiro M . Pharmaceutical advertisements in leading medical journals: experts' assessments. Ann Intern Med. 1992; 116(11):912-9. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-116-11-912. View

3.
Lankinen K, Levola T, Marttinen K, Puumalainen I, Helin-Salmivaara A . Industry guidelines, laws and regulations ignored: quality of drug advertising in medical journals. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004; 13(11):789-95. DOI: 10.1002/pds.1017. View

4.
McAlister F, Straus S, Guyatt G, Haynes R . Users' guides to the medical literature: XX. Integrating research evidence with the care of the individual patient. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 2000; 283(21):2829-36. DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.21.2829. View

5.
Mindell J, Kemp T . Evidence based advertising? Only two fifths of advertisements cited published, peer reviewed references. BMJ. 1998; 315(7122):1622. PMC: 2127972. View