» Articles » PMID: 21850398

Global Bioethics and Communitarianism

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2011 Aug 19
PMID 21850398
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper explores the role of 'community' in the context of global bioethics. With the present globalization of bioethics, new and interesting references are made to this concept. Some are familiar, for example, community consent. This article argues that the principle of informed consent is too individual-oriented and that in other cultures, consent can be community-based. Other references to 'community' are related to the novel principle of benefit sharing in the context of bioprospecting. The application of this principle necessarily requires the identification and construction of communities. On the global level there are also new uses of the concept of community as 'global community.' Three uses are distinguished: (1) a diachronic use, including past, present, and future generations, (2) a synchronic ecological use, including nonhuman species, and (3) a synchronic planetary use, including all human beings worldwide. Although there is a tension between the communitarian perspective and the idea of global community, this article argues that the third use can broaden communitarianism. The current development towards cosmopolitanism is creating a new global community that represents humanity as a whole, enabling identification of world citizens and evoking a sense of global solidarity and responsibility. The emergence of global bioethics today demonstrates this development.

Citing Articles

Bio-Ethics and One Health: A Case Study Approach to Building Reflexive Governance.

Boudreau LeBlanc A, Williams-Jones B, Aenishaenslin C Front Public Health. 2022; 10:648593.

PMID: 35372246 PMC: 8971560. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.648593.


Exploring values among three cultures from a global bioethics perspective.

Nortje N, Jones-Bonofiglio K, Sotomayor C Glob Bioeth. 2021; 32(1):1-14.

PMID: 33658749 PMC: 7872551. DOI: 10.1080/11287462.2021.1879462.


A meta-science for a global bioethics and biomedicine.

Basser D Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2017; 12(1):9.

PMID: 29110730 PMC: 5674752. DOI: 10.1186/s13010-017-0051-y.


Success rates for consent and collection of prenatal biological specimens in an epidemiologic survey of child health.

Abdul-Rahman O, Rodriguez B, Wadlinger S, Slutsman J, Boyle E, Merrill L Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2015; 106(1):47-54.

PMID: 26407522 PMC: 4718757. DOI: 10.1002/bdra.23455.


Characteristics, determinants and perspectives of experienced medical humanitarians: a qualitative approach.

Asgary R, Lawrence K BMJ Open. 2014; 4(12):e006460.

PMID: 25492274 PMC: 4265098. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006460.

References
1.
MacQueen K, MClellan E, Metzger D, Kegeles S, Strauss R, Scotti R . What is community? An evidence-based definition for participatory public health. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91(12):1929-38. PMC: 1446907. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.12.1929. View

2.
Callahan D . Individual good and common good: a communitarian approach to bioethics. Perspect Biol Med. 2003; 46(4):496-507. DOI: 10.1353/pbm.2003.0083. View

3.
Hellsten S . Global bioethics: utopia or reality?. Dev World Bioeth. 2009; 8(2):70-81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00162.x. View

4.
Graboyes M . Fines, orders, fear . . . and consent? Medical research in East Africa, C. 1950s. Dev World Bioeth. 2010; 10(1):34-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2009.00274.x. View

5.
. Hugo ethics committee statement on benefit sharing: April 9, 2000. Clin Genet. 2001; 58(5):364-6. DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.580505.x. View