» Articles » PMID: 21849323

Shoot, Shovel and Shut Up: Cryptic Poaching Slows Restoration of a Large Carnivore in Europe

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2011 Aug 19
PMID 21849323
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Poaching is a widespread and well-appreciated problem for the conservation of many threatened species. Because poaching is illegal, there is strong incentive for poachers to conceal their activities, and consequently, little data on the effects of poaching on population dynamics are available. Quantifying poaching mortality should be a required knowledge when developing conservation plans for endangered species but is hampered by methodological challenges. We show that rigorous estimates of the effects of poaching relative to other sources of mortality can be obtained with a hierarchical state-space model combined with multiple sources of data. Using the Scandinavian wolf (Canis lupus) population as an illustrative example, we show that poaching accounted for approximately half of total mortality and more than two-thirds of total poaching remained undetected by conventional methods, a source of mortality we term as 'cryptic poaching'. Our simulations suggest that without poaching during the past decade, the population would have been almost four times as large in 2009. Such a severe impact of poaching on population recovery may be widespread among large carnivores. We believe that conservation strategies for large carnivores considering only observed data may not be adequate and should be revised by including and quantifying cryptic poaching.

Citing Articles

Quantifying large carnivore predation relative to human harvest on moose in an intensively managed boreal ecosystem.

Sand H, Zimmermann B, Wabakken P, Eriksen A, Wikenros C Ecol Appl. 2025; 35(1):e70000.

PMID: 39930970 PMC: 11811747. DOI: 10.1002/eap.70000.


Environmental variability across space and time drives the recolonization pattern of a historically persecuted large carnivore.

Moqanaki E, Milleret C, Dupont P, Mattisson J, Dey S, Broseth H Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(5):e2401679122.

PMID: 39869793 PMC: 11804516. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2401679122.


Living with wolves: A worldwide systematic review of attitudes.

Barmoen M, Baerum K, Mathiesen K Ambio. 2024; 53(10):1414-1432.

PMID: 38833186 PMC: 11383909. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-024-02036-1.


Lion () movements in a multiuse area of the eastern Panhandle of the Okavango Delta, Botswana.

LeFlore E, Fuller T, Stein A J Mammal. 2023; 104(6):1317-1328.

PMID: 38059009 PMC: 10697412. DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyad090.


The ecology of human-caused mortality for a protected large carnivore.

Benson J, Dougherty K, Beier P, Boyce W, Cristescu B, Gammons D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(13):e2220030120.

PMID: 36940341 PMC: 10068828. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2220030120.


References
1.
Agnew D, Pearce J, Pramod G, Peatman T, Watson R, Beddington J . Estimating the worldwide extent of illegal fishing. PLoS One. 2009; 4(2):e4570. PMC: 2646833. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004570. View

2.
Gavin M, Solomon J, Blank S . Measuring and monitoring illegal use of natural resources. Conserv Biol. 2009; 24(1):89-100. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01387.x. View

3.
Newman K, Buckland S, Lindley S, Thomas L, Fernandez C . Hidden process models for animal population dynamics. Ecol Appl. 2006; 16(1):74-86. DOI: 10.1890/04-0592. View

4.
Hilborn R, Arcese P, Borner M, Hando J, Hopcraft G, Loibooki M . Effective enforcement in a conservation area. Science. 2006; 314(5803):1266. DOI: 10.1126/science.1132780. View

5.
Bunnefeld N, Hoshino E, Milner-Gulland E . Management strategy evaluation: a powerful tool for conservation?. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 26(9):441-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.05.003. View