» Articles » PMID: 21847771

Fracture Liaison Services: the UK Experience

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2011 Aug 18
PMID 21847771
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) have been shown to deliver clinically and cost-effective osteoporosis care for patients presenting to hospital with fragility fractures. During the first decade of the new millennium, a consensus emerged in the UK on the need for universal access to FLS. This presentation described constructive interactions between policy makers, professional organizations, patients and their associations, and pharmaceutical manufacturers that led to the incorporation of FLS into national policy and guidance.

Citing Articles

Impact of the guidance on fracture Liaison Services and the introduction of a new fee for secondary fracture prevention in Japan: Implementation of secondary fracture prevention during hospitalization for fragility fractures.

Gondo G, Shin J, Kunisawa S, Imanaka Y Osteoporos Int. 2024; 36(2):235-244.

PMID: 39671048 PMC: 11825641. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07269-0.


Enhancing comprehension and fostering involvement in the fracture liaison services system in Türkiye: a call for action.

Temel M, Bagcier F, Tuzun S Arch Osteoporos. 2024; 19(1):108.

PMID: 39505794 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01473-5.


Decrease in osteoporotic fracture in the western Kitakyushu region by the STOP-Fx study.

Yamanaka Y, Ikeda S, Hatakeyama E, Sabanai K, Tanaka H, Nishida S J Bone Miner Metab. 2023; 41(4):557-566.

PMID: 37247111 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-023-01430-1.


Spanish National Registry of Major Osteoporotic Fractures (REFRA) seen at Fracture Liaison Services (FLS): objectives and quality standards.

Montoya-Garcia M, Carbonell-Abella C, Cancio-Trujillo J, Moro-Alvarez M, Mora-Fernandez J, Izquierdo-Avino R Arch Osteoporos. 2022; 17(1):138.

PMID: 36318373 PMC: 9626427. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-022-01174-x.


Deep Learning for Bone Mineral Density and T-Score Prediction from Chest X-rays: A Multicenter Study.

Sato Y, Yamamoto N, Inagaki N, Iesaki Y, Asamoto T, Suzuki T Biomedicines. 2022; 10(9).

PMID: 36140424 PMC: 9496220. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10092323.


References
1.
Langridge C, McQuillian C, Watson W, Walker B, Mitchell L, Gallacher S . Refracture following fracture liaison service assessment illustrates the requirement for integrated falls and fracture services. Calcif Tissue Int. 2007; 81(2):85-91. DOI: 10.1007/s00223-007-9042-0. View

2.
McLellan A, Gallacher S, Fraser M, McQuillian C . The fracture liaison service: success of a program for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2003; 14(12):1028-34. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1507-z. View

3.
Brankin E, Mitchell C, Munro R . Closing the osteoporosis management gap in primary care: a secondary prevention of fracture programme. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005; 21(4):475-82. DOI: 10.1185/030079905X38150. View

4.
Chami G, Jeys L, Freudmann M, Connor L, Siddiqi M . Are osteoporotic fractures being adequately investigated? A questionnaire of GP & orthopaedic surgeons. BMC Fam Pract. 2006; 7:7. PMC: 1388220. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-7. View

5.
Majumdar S, Lier D, Beaupre L, Hanley D, Maksymowych W, Juby A . Osteoporosis case manager for patients with hip fractures: results of a cost-effectiveness analysis conducted alongside a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(1):25-31. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.169.1.25. View