» Articles » PMID: 21846780

Same Organization, Same Electronic Health Records (EHRs) System, Different Use: Exploring the Linkage Between Practice Member Communication Patterns and EHR Use Patterns in an Ambulatory Care Setting

Overview
Date 2011 Aug 18
PMID 21846780
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Despite efforts made by ambulatory care organizations to standardize the use of electronic health records (EHRs), practices often incorporate these systems into their work differently from each other. One potential factor contributing to these differences is within-practice communication patterns. The authors explore the linkage between within-practice communication patterns and practice-level EHR use patterns.

Design: Qualitative study of six practices operating within the same multi-specialty ambulatory care organization using the same EHR system. Semistructured interviews and direct observation were conducted with all physicians, nurses, medical assistants, practice managers, and non-clinical staff from each practice.

Measurements: An existing model of practice relationships was used to analyze communication patterns within the practices. Practice-level EHR use was defined and analyzed as the ways in which a practice uses an EHR as a collective or a group-including the degree of feature use, level of EHR-enabled communication, and frequency that EHR use changes in a practice. Interview and observation data were analyzed for themes. Based on these themes, within-practice communication patterns were categorized as fragmented or cohesive, and practice-level EHR use patterns were categorized as heterogeneous or homogeneous. Practices where EHR use was uniformly high across all users were further categorized as having standardized EHR use. Communication patterns and EHR use patterns were compared across the six practices.

Results: Within-practice communication patterns were associated with practice-level EHR use patterns. In practices where communication patterns were fragmented, EHR use was heterogeneous. In practices where communication patterns were cohesive, EHR use was homogeneous. Additional analysis revealed that practices that had achieved standardized EHR use (uniformly high EHR use across all users) exhibited high levels of mindfulness and respectful interaction, whereas practices that were furthest from achieving standardized EHR use exhibited low levels of mindfulness and respectful interaction.

Conclusion: Within-practice communication patterns provide a unique perspective for exploring the issue of standardization in EHR use. A major fallacy of setting homogeneous EHR use as the goal for practice-level EHR use is that practices with uniformly low EHR use could be considered successful. Achieving uniformly high EHR use across all users in a practice is more consistent with the goals of current EHR adoption and use efforts. It was found that some communication patterns among practice members may enable more standardized EHR use than others. Understanding the linkage between communication patterns and EHR use can inform understanding of the human element in EHR use and may provide key lessons for the implementation of EHRs and other health information technologies.

Citing Articles

Relative bed allocation for COVID-19 patients, EHR investments, and COVID-19 mortality outcomes.

Patel P, Tsionas M, Devaraj S PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0286210.

PMID: 37883479 PMC: 10602360. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286210.


Unpacking the 'process of sustaining'-identifying threats to sustainability and the strategies used to address them: a longitudinal multiple case study.

Lennox L, Antonacci G, Harris M, Reed J Implement Sci Commun. 2023; 4(1):68.

PMID: 37337274 PMC: 10278281. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00445-z.


Digital Maturity and Its Measurement of General Practitioners: A Scoping Review.

Neunaber T, Meister S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(5).

PMID: 36901387 PMC: 10001864. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20054377.


The role of organizational culture in health information technology implementations: A scoping review.

Rajamani S, Hultman G, Bakker C, Melton G Learn Health Syst. 2022; 6(3):e10299.

PMID: 35860317 PMC: 9284926. DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10299.


Improving dementia care: insights from audit and feedback in interdisciplinary primary care sites.

Arsenault-Lapierre G, Le Berre M, Rojas-Rozo L, McAiney C, Ingram J, Lee L BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):353.

PMID: 35300660 PMC: 8931981. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07672-5.


References
1.
Romano M, Stafford R . Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality. Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171(10):897-903. PMC: 4016790. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.527. View

2.
DesRoches C, Campbell E, Vogeli C, Zheng J, Rao S, Shields A . Electronic health records' limited successes suggest more targeted uses. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010; 29(4):639-46. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.1086. View

3.
Epstein R . Mindful practice. JAMA. 1999; 282(9):833-9. DOI: 10.1001/jama.282.9.833. View

4.
Linder J, Ma J, Bates D, Middleton B, Stafford R . Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167(13):1400-5. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.167.13.1400. View

5.
Aarts J, Ash J, Berg M . Extending the understanding of computerized physician order entry: implications for professional collaboration, workflow and quality of care. Int J Med Inform. 2006; 76 Suppl 1:S4-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.009. View