» Articles » PMID: 21845095

Variations in Content and Extractability of Durum Wheat (Triticum Turgidum L. Var Durum) Arabinoxylans Associated with Genetic and Environmental Factors

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2011 Aug 17
PMID 21845095
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Arabinoxylans (AX) represent the most abundant components of non-starch polysaccharides in wheat, constituting about 70% of cell wall polysaccharides. An important property of AX is their ability to form highly viscous water solutions; this peculiarity has a significant impact on the technological characteristics of wheat and determines the physiologically positive influence in consumption. Durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var durum), the raw material for pasta production, is one of the most important crops in Italy. As part of a large project aimed at improving durum wheat quality, the characterization of the nutritional and technological aspects of whole grains was considered. Particular attention was addressed to identify the best suited genotypes for the production of innovative types of pasta with enhanced functional and organoleptic properties. The objective of the present study was to investigate the genetic variability of AX by examining a group of durum wheat genotypes collected at two localities in Italy for two consecutive years. The environmental influence on AX content and extractability was also evaluated. Variability in the AX fraction contents was observed; the results indicated that AX fractions of durum wheat grain can be affected by the genotype and environment characteristics and the different contribution of genotype and environment to total variation was evidenced. The genotype × environment (G × E) interaction was significant for all examined traits, the variations due to G × E being lower than that of genotype or environment. The data and the statistical analysis allowed identification of the Italian durum wheat varieties that were consistently higher in total arabinoxilans; in addition, principal component analysis biplots illustrated that for arabinoxylan fractions some varieties responded differently in various environment climatic conditions.

Citing Articles

Identification and development of functional markers for purple grain genes in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.).

Esposito S, Palombieri S, Vitale P, Angione G, DAttilia C, Taranto F Theor Appl Genet. 2024; 137(9):210.

PMID: 39198268 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-024-04710-0.


Factors Affecting the Nutritional, Health, and Technological Quality of Durum Wheat for Pasta-Making: A Systematic Literature Review.

Zingale S, Spina A, Ingrao C, Fallico B, Timpanaro G, Anastasi U Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(3).

PMID: 36771615 PMC: 9920027. DOI: 10.3390/plants12030530.


The Influence of Farming Systems, Genotype and Their Interaction on Bioactive Compound, Protein and Starch Content of Bread and Spelt Wheat.

Takac V, Toth V, Rakszegi M, Miko P, Mikic S, Mirosavljevic M Foods. 2022; 11(24).

PMID: 36553770 PMC: 9778307. DOI: 10.3390/foods11244028.


Influence of Drought and Salt Stress on Durum Wheat Grain Quality and Composition: A Review.

De Santis M, Soccio M, Laus M, Flagella Z Plants (Basel). 2021; 10(12).

PMID: 34961071 PMC: 8708103. DOI: 10.3390/plants10122599.


Comparison of the dietary fibre composition of old and modern durum wheat (Triticum turgidum spp. durum) genotypes.

De Santis M, Kosik O, Passmore D, Flagella Z, Shewry P, Lovegrove A Food Chem. 2017; 244:304-310.

PMID: 29120786 PMC: 5692191. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.09.143.


References
1.
Garcia A, Otto B, Reich S, Weickert M, Steiniger J, Machowetz A . Arabinoxylan consumption decreases postprandial serum glucose, serum insulin and plasma total ghrelin response in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006; 61(3):334-41. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602525. View

2.
Slavin J . Position of the American Dietetic Association: health implications of dietary fiber. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008; 108(10):1716-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.08.007. View

3.
Gebruers K, Dornez E, Bedo Z, Rakszegi M, Fras A, Boros D . Environment and genotype effects on the content of dietary fiber and its components in wheat in the HEALTHGRAIN diversity screen. J Agric Food Chem. 2010; 58(17):9353-61. DOI: 10.1021/jf100447g. View

4.
Slavin J . Why whole grains are protective: biological mechanisms. Proc Nutr Soc. 2003; 62(1):129-34. DOI: 10.1079/PNS2002221. View

5.
Jones J, Engleson J . Whole grains: benefits and challenges. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2011; 1:19-40. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.food.112408.132746. View