» Articles » PMID: 2183882

Applications of Graph Theory to Enzyme Kinetics and Protein Folding Kinetics. Steady and Non-steady-state Systems

Overview
Journal Biophys Chem
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 1990 Jan 1
PMID 2183882
Citations 55
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Graphic methods have proved to be very useful in enzyme kinetics, as reflected in both raising the efficiency of performing calculations and aiding in the analysis of catalytic mechanisms. The kinetic relations among protein folding states are very similar to those between enzyme-catalyzed species. Therefore, it should be equally useful to provide a visually intuitive relation between kinetic calculations and folding mechanisms for protein folding kinetics, as manifested by the graphic rules in enzyme kinetics. It can actually be anticipated that, due to increasing interest in protein folding, the graphic method will become an important tool in folding kinetics as well. Based on the recent progress made in graphic methods of enzyme kinetics, in this review four graphic rules are summarized, which can be used to deal with protein folding systems as well as enzyme-catalyzed systems. Rules 1-3 are established for deriving the kinetic equations for steady-state processes and Rule 4 for those in the case of non-steady-state processes. In comparison with conventional graphic methods, which can only be applied to a steady-state system, the current rules have the following advantages: (1) Complicated and tedious calculations can be greatly simplified. (2) A lot of wasted labor can be turned away. (3) Final results can be double-checked by a formula provided in each of the graphic rules. (4) Transient kinetic systems can also be treated. The mathematical proof of Rules 1-4 is given in appendices A-D, respectively.

Citing Articles

Benchmarking methods for computing local sensitivities in ordinary differential equation models at dynamic and steady states.

Lakrisenko P, Pathirana D, Weindl D, Hasenauer J PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0312148.

PMID: 39441813 PMC: 11498742. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312148.


Efficient computation of adjoint sensitivities at steady-state in ODE models of biochemical reaction networks.

Lakrisenko P, Stapor P, Grein S, Paszkowski L, Pathirana D, Frohlich F PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(1):e1010783.

PMID: 36595539 PMC: 9838866. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010783.


The Graphical Studies of the Major Molecular Interactions for Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule (NCAM) Polysialylation by Incorporating Wenxiang Diagram into NMR Spectroscopy.

Zhou G, Huang R Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(23).

PMID: 36499451 PMC: 9736422. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232315128.


Dynamic modeling of cellular response to DNA damage based on p53 stress response networks.

Qi J, Ding Y, Shao S Prog Nat Sci. 2020; 19(10):1349-1356.

PMID: 32288404 PMC: 7128557. DOI: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2009.03.008.


Study of peptide fingerprints of parasite proteins and drug-DNA interactions with Markov-Mean-Energy invariants of biopolymer molecular-dynamic lattice networks.

Perez-Montoto L, Dea-Ayuela M, Prado-Prado F, Bolas-Fernandez F, Ubeira F, Gonzalez-Diaz H Polymer (Guildf). 2020; 50(15):3857-3870.

PMID: 32287404 PMC: 7111648. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.05.055.