» Articles » PMID: 21832129

Classical Conditioning Through Auditory Stimuli in Drosophila: Methods and Models

Overview
Journal J Exp Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2011 Aug 12
PMID 21832129
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The role of sound in Drosophila melanogaster courtship, along with its perception via the antennae, is well established, as is the ability of this fly to learn in classical conditioning protocols. Here, we demonstrate that a neutral acoustic stimulus paired with a sucrose reward can be used to condition the proboscis-extension reflex, part of normal feeding behavior. This appetitive conditioning produces results comparable to those obtained with chemical stimuli in aversive conditioning protocols. We applied a logistic model with general estimating equations to predict the dynamics of learning, which successfully predicts the outcome of training and provides a quantitative estimate of the rate of learning. Use of acoustic stimuli with appetitive conditioning provides both an alternative to models most commonly used in studies of learning and memory in Drosophila and a means of testing hearing in both sexes, independently of courtship responsiveness.

Citing Articles

Behavioral response of house flies (Diptera: Muscidae) to 3 bittering agents.

Gunathunga P, King B, Geden C J Insect Sci. 2025; 25(1).

PMID: 39903061 PMC: 11792078. DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/ieae117.


Rest Is Required to Learn an Appetitively-Reinforced Operant Task in .

Wiggin T, Hsiao Y, Liu J, Huber R, Griffith L Front Behav Neurosci. 2021; 15:681593.

PMID: 34220464 PMC: 8250850. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.681593.


Short-Term Effects of Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Learning and Evoked Activity in Auditory Cortex.

Lai J, David S eNeuro. 2021; 8(3).

PMID: 34088737 PMC: 8240839. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0522-20.2021.


Sound localization behavior in depends on inter-antenna vibration amplitude comparisons.

Batchelor A, Wilson R J Exp Biol. 2019; 222(Pt 3).

PMID: 30733260 PMC: 6381992. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.191213.


The Olfactory Proboscis Extension Response in the Honey Bee: A Laboratory Exercise in Classical Conditioning.

Van Nest B J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2018; 16(2):A168-A176.

PMID: 30057499 PMC: 6057764.


References
1.
Zeger S, Liang K . Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 1986; 42(1):121-30. View

2.
Chabaud M, Devaud J, Pham-Delegue M, Preat T, Kaiser L . Olfactory conditioning of proboscis activity in Drosophila melanogaster. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2006; 192(12):1335-48. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-006-0160-3. View

3.
King-Smith P, Grigsby S, Vingrys A, Benes S, Supowit A . Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation. Vision Res. 1994; 34(7):885-912. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90039-6. View

4.
Bitterman M, Menzel R, Fietz A, Schafer S . Classical conditioning of proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera). J Comp Psychol. 1983; 97(2):107-19. View

5.
Eberl D, Hardy R, Kernan M . Genetically similar transduction mechanisms for touch and hearing in Drosophila. J Neurosci. 2000; 20(16):5981-8. PMC: 6772586. View