» Articles » PMID: 21818526

Preliminary Observations and Clinical Value of N-acetyl Resonances in Ovarian Tumours Using In-vivo Proton MR Spectroscopy at 3T

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2011 Aug 6
PMID 21818526
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To retrospectively evaluate the clinical significance of N-acetyl resonances at 2 ppm in in-vivo proton magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy for distinguishing mucinous and non-mucinous tumours in patients with ovarian masses.

Methods: MR spectroscopy was performed in patients with pathologically diagnosed ovarian tumours at 3T-MR imaging. Single-voxel MR spectroscopy data were collected from a single square volume of interest that encompassed the ovarian masses. The metabolite resonance peak areas at 2 ppm were quantified relative to unsuppressed water using a software package (LCModel).

Results: A total of 32 ovarian lesions in 32 patients were evaluated in this study. High metabolite peak at 2 ppm was observed in all nine mucinous tumours (9.71 +/- 7.46 mM), whereas low peak was observed in 14 of 23 non-mucinous tumours (3.12 +/- 1.42 mM) (p < 0.001). Using a cut off value of 4.45 mM for mucinous tumours had a sensitivity of 89%, specificity of 86%, PPV of 80%, and NPV of 92%.

Conclusion: Proton MR spectroscopy with quantitative evaluation of the metabolite at 2 ppm concentration, which may suggest the presence of mucinous material containing N-acetyl mucinous compounds, can provide helpful information in distinguishing mucinous and non-mucinous ovarian tumours. Key Points • MR spectroscopy helps distinguish mucinous from non-mucinous ovarian tumours. • High N-acetyl resonance at 2 ppm is observed in ovarian mucinous tumours. • Thus MR spectroscopy could improve management of these patients.

Citing Articles

Proton MR spectroscopy and the detection of malignancy in ovarian masses.

Mansour S, Gomma M, Shafik P Br J Radiol. 2019; 92(1101):20190134.

PMID: 31287729 PMC: 6732908. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190134.


MR imaging of ovarian masses: classification and differential diagnosis.

Foti P, Attina G, Spadola S, Caltabiano R, Farina R, Palmucci S Insights Imaging. 2015; 7(1):21-41.

PMID: 26671276 PMC: 4729709. DOI: 10.1007/s13244-015-0455-4.

References
1.
Silverberg S . Prognostic significance of pathologic features of ovarian carcinoma. Curr Top Pathol. 1989; 78:85-109. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-74011-4_5. View

2.
Glunde K, Jacobs M, Bhujwalla Z . Choline metabolism in cancer: implications for diagnosis and therapy. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2006; 6(6):821-9. DOI: 10.1586/14737159.6.6.821. View

3.
Jung S, Lee J, Eun Rha S, Byun J, Jung J, Hahn S . CT and MR imaging of ovarian tumors with emphasis on differential diagnosis. Radiographics. 2002; 22(6):1305-25. DOI: 10.1148/rg.226025033. View

4.
Makar A, Baekelandt M, Trope C, Kristensen G . The prognostic significance of residual disease, FIGO substage, tumor histology, and grade in patients with FIGO stage III ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1995; 56(2):175-80. DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1995.1027. View

5.
Hess V, AHern R, Nasiri N, King D, Blake P, Barton D . Mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer: a separate entity requiring specific treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(6):1040-4. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.078. View