» Articles » PMID: 21817091

Striatum-medial Prefrontal Cortex Connectivity Predicts Developmental Changes in Reinforcement Learning

Overview
Journal Cereb Cortex
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Aug 6
PMID 21817091
Citations 121
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During development, children improve in learning from feedback to adapt their behavior. However, it is still unclear which neural mechanisms might underlie these developmental changes. In the current study, we used a reinforcement learning model to investigate neurodevelopmental changes in the representation and processing of learning signals. Sixty-seven healthy volunteers between ages 8 and 22 (children: 8-11 years, adolescents: 13-16 years, and adults: 18-22 years) performed a probabilistic learning task while in a magnetic resonance imaging scanner. The behavioral data demonstrated age differences in learning parameters with a stronger impact of negative feedback on expected value in children. Imaging data revealed that the neural representation of prediction errors was similar across age groups, but functional connectivity between the ventral striatum and the medial prefrontal cortex changed as a function of age. Furthermore, the connectivity strength predicted the tendency to alter expectations after receiving negative feedback. These findings suggest that the underlying mechanisms of developmental changes in learning are not related to differences in the neural representation of learning signals per se but rather in how learning signals are used to guide behavior and expectations.

Citing Articles

Relevance of Probabilistic Reversal Learning for Adolescent Drinking Trajectories.

Frohner J, Waltmann M, Reiter A, Kraplin A, Smolka M Addict Biol. 2025; 30(3):e70026.

PMID: 40049217 PMC: 11884864. DOI: 10.1111/adb.70026.


Understanding the development of a functional brain circuit: reward processing as an illustration.

Opendak M, Meyer H, Callaghan B, Abramson L, John S, Bath K Transl Psychiatry. 2025; 15(1):53.

PMID: 39962048 PMC: 11832941. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-025-03280-z.


Interpretation of individual differences in computational neuroscience using a latent input approach.

Schaaf J, Miletic S, van Duijvenvoorde A, Huizenga H Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025; 72:101512.

PMID: 39854872 PMC: 11804603. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101512.


Altered learning from positive feedback in adolescents with anorexia nervosa.

Uniacke B, van den Bos W, Wonderlich J, Ojeda J, Posner J, Steinglass J J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2024; 30(7):651-659.

PMID: 39291440 PMC: 11773347. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617724000237.


Reinforcement learning processes as forecasters of depression remission.

Bansal V, McCurry K, Lisinski J, Kim D, Goyal S, Wang J J Affect Disord. 2024; 368:829-837.

PMID: 39271064 PMC: 11573115. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.066.


References
1.
Supekar K, Musen M, Menon V . Development of large-scale functional brain networks in children. PLoS Biol. 2009; 7(7):e1000157. PMC: 2705656. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000157. View

2.
Knutson B, Westdorp A, Kaiser E, Hommer D . FMRI visualization of brain activity during a monetary incentive delay task. Neuroimage. 2000; 12(1):20-7. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0593. View

3.
Casey B, Davidson M, Hara Y, Thomas K, Martinez A, Galvan A . Early development of subcortical regions involved in non-cued attention switching. Dev Sci. 2004; 7(5):534-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00377.x. View

4.
Glascher J, Daw N, Dayan P, ODoherty J . States versus rewards: dissociable neural prediction error signals underlying model-based and model-free reinforcement learning. Neuron. 2010; 66(4):585-95. PMC: 2895323. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.016. View

5.
Van Leijenhorst L, Zanolie K, van Meel C, Westenberg P, Rombouts S, Crone E . What motivates the adolescent? Brain regions mediating reward sensitivity across adolescence. Cereb Cortex. 2009; 20(1):61-9. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp078. View