» Articles » PMID: 21816304

Culprit Vessel Only Versus Multivessel and Staged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Multivessel Disease in Patients Presenting with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a Pairwise and Network Meta-analysis

Overview
Date 2011 Aug 6
PMID 21816304
Citations 86
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The purposes of this study were to investigate whether, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) should be confined to the culprit or also nonculprit vessels and, when performing PCI for nonculprit vessels, whether it should take place during primary PCI or staged procedures.

Background: A significant percentage of STEMI patients have MVD. However, the best PCI strategy for nonculprit vessel lesions is unknown.

Methods: Pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed on 3 PCI strategies for MVD in STEMI patients: 1) culprit vessel only PCI strategy (culprit PCI), defined as PCI confined to culprit vessel lesions only; 2) multivessel PCI strategy (MV-PCI), defined as PCI of culprit vessel as well as ≥1 nonculprit vessel lesions; and 3) staged PCI strategy (staged PCI), defined as PCI confined to culprit vessel, after which ≥1 nonculprit vessel lesions are treated during staged procedures. Prospective and retrospective studies were included when research subjects were patients with STEMI and MVD undergoing PCI. The primary endpoint was short-term mortality.

Results: Four prospective and 14 retrospective studies involving 40,280 patients were included. Pairwise meta-analyses demonstrated that staged PCI was associated with lower short- and long-term mortality as compared with culprit PCI and MV-PCI and that MV-PCI was associated with highest mortality rates at both short- and long-term follow-up. In network analyses, staged PCI was also consistently associated with lower mortality.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis supports current guidelines discouraging performance of multivessel primary PCI for STEMI. When significant nonculprit vessel lesions are suitable for PCI, they should only be treated during staged procedures.

Citing Articles

Clinical Outcomes of Immediate Versus Staged Revascularization of Nonculprit Arteries in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yasmin F, Zaidi S, Moeed A, Shahzad M, Asghar M, Sadiq M Clin Cardiol. 2025; 48(3):e70105.

PMID: 40065749 PMC: 11894271. DOI: 10.1002/clc.70105.


Influence of Clinical, Angiographic, and Developmental Characteristics and COVID-19 Severity and Vaccination Status on Young Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Vityala Y, Palagudi M, Para S, Meduri K, Duvvuri S, Manne L J Midlife Health. 2024; 15(3):173-181.

PMID: 39610960 PMC: 11601926. DOI: 10.4103/jmh.jmh_59_24.


Culprit vessel only versus complete revascularization following thrombolysis in patients with ST elevation myocardial infraction and multivessel coronary artery disease - A prospective study.

Jain C, Dash P, Iyer V, Deshmukh R Indian Heart J. 2023; 75(4):274-278.

PMID: 37402433 PMC: 10421984. DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.06.010.


Culprit versus Complete Revascularization during the Initial Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Using a Virtual Treatment Planning Tool: Results of a Single-Center Pilot Study.

Vasiljevs D, Kakurina N, Pontaga N, Kokina B, Osipovs V, Sorokins N Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(2).

PMID: 36837471 PMC: 9967361. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59020270.


Coronary computed tomography angiography and single-photon emission computerized tomography in chronic total occlusions: the Rosetta Stone for PCI planning?.

Alahdab F, Ahmed A, Al-Mallah M J Nucl Cardiol. 2023; 30(1):399-402.

PMID: 36682017 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-022-03157-4.