» Articles » PMID: 21815959

The Effectiveness of Interventions for Reducing Stigma Related to Substance Use Disorders: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Addiction
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2011 Aug 6
PMID 21815959
Citations 247
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: This study provides a systematic review of existing research that has empirically evaluated interventions designed to reduce stigma related to substance use disorders.

Methods: A comprehensive review of electronic databases was conducted to identify evaluations of substance use disorder related stigma interventions. Studies that met inclusion criteria were synthesized and assessed using systematic review methods.

Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the studies was moderately strong. Interventions of three studies (23%) focused on people with substance use disorders (self-stigma), three studies (23%) targeted the general public (social stigma) and seven studies (54%) focused on medical students and other professional groups (structural stigma). Nine interventions (69%) used approaches that included education and/or direct contact with people who have substance use disorders. All but one study indicated their interventions produced positive effects on at least one stigma outcome measure. None of the interventions have been evaluated across different settings or populations.

Conclusions: A range of interventions demonstrate promise for achieving meaningful improvements in stigma related to substance use disorders. The limited evidence indicates that self-stigma can be reduced through therapeutic interventions such as group-based acceptance and commitment therapy. Effective strategies for addressing social stigma include motivational interviewing and communicating positive stories of people with substance use disorders. For changing stigma at a structural level, contact-based training and education programs targeting medical students and professionals (e.g. police, counsellors) are effective.

Citing Articles

A stakeholder-driven approach to designing a peer recovery coach role for implementation in community-oriented primary care teams in South Africa.

Myers B, Regenauer K, Johnson K, Brown I, Rose A, Ciya N Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025; 20(1):15.

PMID: 39948609 PMC: 11827258. DOI: 10.1186/s13722-025-00544-3.


Physician Interactions Associated With Increased Reception of Substance Use Disorder Treatment.

Smurzynski A, Gardere J, Ogunsakin O Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e76950.

PMID: 39906455 PMC: 11793833. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76950.


Care for patients with cancer and substance use disorders: a qualitative study of oncology team experiences.

Kale S, Rush L, Eramo J, Bitangacha M, Chen S, Check D Support Care Cancer. 2025; 33(2):146.

PMID: 39903305 PMC: 11794404. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-025-09181-7.


Unveiling the landscape of antistigma interventions for individuals with substance use disorders: A scoping review.

Ghosh A, Sharma B, Sood A, Sharma K Indian J Psychiatry. 2025; 66(12):1101-1123.

PMID: 39867231 PMC: 11758978. DOI: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_770_24.


Decrease in provider stigma is associated with improved quality health indicators among individuals receiving methadone in primary care centers in Ukraine.

Machavariani E, Bromberg D, Dumchev K, Esserman D, Earnshaw V, Pykalo I Int J Drug Policy. 2024; 136:104682.

PMID: 39705875 PMC: 11821433. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104682.


References
1.
Bland E, Oppenheimer L, Morel C, Holmes P, Gruslin A . Influence of an educational program on medical students' attitudes to substance use disorders in pregnancy. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2001; 27(3):483-90. DOI: 10.1081/ada-100104513. View

2.
SHUSTER M, Lewin M . Needle tracks in narcotic addicts. N Y State J Med. 1968; 68(24):3129-34. View

3.
Stuber J, Meyer I, Link B . Stigma, prejudice, discrimination and health. Soc Sci Med. 2008; 67(3):351-7. PMC: 4006697. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.023. View

4.
Ahern J, Stuber J, Galea S . Stigma, discrimination and the health of illicit drug users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006; 88(2-3):188-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.10.014. View

5.
Downs S, Black N . The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998; 52(6):377-84. PMC: 1756728. DOI: 10.1136/jech.52.6.377. View