» Articles » PMID: 21815821

Community Engagement About Genetic Variation Research

Overview
Publisher Mary Ann Liebert
Date 2011 Aug 6
PMID 21815821
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this article is to describe the methods and effectiveness of the Public Engagement in Genetic Variation and Haplotype Mapping Issues (PEGV) Project, which engaged a community in policy discussion about genetic variation research. The project implemented a 6-stage community engagement model in New Rochelle, New York. First, researchers recruited community partners. Second, the project team created community oversight. Third, focus groups discussed concerns generated by genetic variation research. Fourth, community dialogue sessions addressed focus group findings and developed policy recommendations. Fifth, a conference was held to present these policy recommendations and to provide a forum for HapMap (haplotype mapping) researchers to dialogue directly with residents. Finally, findings were disseminated via presentations and papers to the participants and to the wider community beyond. The project generated a list of proposed guidelines for genetic variation research that addressed the concerns of New Rochelle residents. Project team members expressed satisfaction with the engagement model overall but expressed concerns about how well community groups were utilized and what segment of the community actually engaged in the project. The PEGV Project represents a model for researchers to engage the general public in policy development about genetic research. There are benefits of such a process beyond the desired genetic research.

Citing Articles

A scoping review of guidelines for the use of race, ethnicity, and ancestry reveals widespread consensus but also points of ongoing disagreement.

Mauro M, Allen D, Dauda B, Molina S, Neale B, Lewis A Am J Hum Genet. 2022; 109(12):2110-2125.

PMID: 36400022 PMC: 9808506. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.11.001.


The reported impact of public involvement in biobanks: A scoping review.

Luna Puerta L, Kendall W, Davies B, Day S, Ward H Health Expect. 2020; 23(4):759-788.

PMID: 32378306 PMC: 7495079. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13067.


Engaging rural communities in genetic research: challenges and opportunities.

Dean C, Fogleman A, Zahnd W, Lipka A, Malhi R, Delfino K J Community Genet. 2017; 8(3):209-219.

PMID: 28477297 PMC: 5496842. DOI: 10.1007/s12687-017-0304-x.


Current practice of public involvement activities in biomedical research and innovation: a systematic qualitative review.

Lander J, Hainz T, Hirschberg I, Strech D PLoS One. 2014; 9(12):e113274.

PMID: 25469705 PMC: 4254603. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113274.


Community leaders' perspectives on engaging African Americans in biobanks and other human genetics initiatives.

Buseh A, Stevens P, Millon-Underwood S, Townsend L, Kelber S J Community Genet. 2013; 4(4):483-94.

PMID: 23813337 PMC: 3773318. DOI: 10.1007/s12687-013-0155-z.

References
1.
Sharp R, Foster M . Involving study populations in the review of genetic research. J Law Med Ethics. 2000; 28(1):41-51, 3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00315.x. View

2.
Foster M, Sharp R, FREEMAN W, Chino M, Bernsten D, Carter T . The role of community review in evaluating the risks of human genetic variation research. Am J Hum Genet. 1999; 64(6):1719-27. PMC: 1377916. DOI: 10.1086/302415. View

3.
Williams G, ABBOTT R, Taylor D . Using focus group methodology to develop breast cancer screening programs that recruit African American women. J Community Health. 1997; 22(1):45-56. DOI: 10.1023/a:1025146907662. View

4.
. A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature. 2005; 437(7063):1299-320. PMC: 1880871. DOI: 10.1038/nature04226. View

5.
Fine M, Ibrahim S, Thomas S . The role of race and genetics in health disparities research. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95(12):2125-8. PMC: 1449495. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.076588. View