» Articles » PMID: 21811600

A Star in the Brainstem Reveals the First Step of Cortical Magnification

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2011 Aug 4
PMID 21811600
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A fundamental question in the neurosciences is how central nervous system (CNS) space is allocated to different sensory inputs. Yet it is difficult to measure innervation density and corresponding representational areas in the CNS of most species. These measurements can be made in star-nosed moles (Condylura cristata) because the cortical representation of nasal rays is visible in flattened sections and afferents from each ray can be counted. Here we used electrophysiological recordings combined with sections of the brainstem to identify a large, visible star representation in the principal sensory nucleus (PrV). PrV was greatly expanded and bulged out of the brainstem rostrally to partially invade the trigeminal nerve. The star representation was a distinct PrV subnucleus containing 11 modules, each representing one of the nasal rays. The 11 PrV ray representations were reconstructed to obtain volumes and the largest module corresponded to ray 11, the mole's tactile fovea. These measures were compared to fiber counts and primary cortical areas from a previous investigation. PrV ray volumes were closely correlated with the number of afferents from each ray, but afferents from the behaviorally most important, 11(th) ray were preferentially over-represented. This over-representation at the brainstem level was much less than at the cortical level. Our results indicate that PrV provides the first step in magnifying CNS representations of important afferents, but additional magnification occurs at higher levels. The early development of the 11(th), foveal appendage could provide a mechanism for the most important afferents to capture the most CNS space.

Citing Articles

Expansion and contraction of resource allocation in sensory bottlenecks.

Edmondson L, Jimenez Rodriguez A, Saal H Elife. 2022; 11.

PMID: 35924884 PMC: 9391039. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.70777.


Sensory computations in the cuneate nucleus of macaques.

Suresh A, Greenspon C, He Q, Rosenow J, Miller L, Bensmaia S Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(49).

PMID: 34853173 PMC: 8670430. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2115772118.


Mechanoreceptor synapses in the brainstem shape the central representation of touch.

Lehnert B, Santiago C, Huey E, Emanuel A, Renauld S, Africawala N Cell. 2021; 184(22):5608-5621.e18.

PMID: 34637701 PMC: 8556359. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.023.


Where am I? Who am I? The Relation Between Spatial Cognition, Social Cognition and Individual Differences in the Built Environment.

Proulx M, Todorov O, Taylor Aiken A, de Sousa A Front Psychol. 2016; 7:64.

PMID: 26903893 PMC: 4749931. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00064.


Somatosensory organ topography across the star of the star-nosed mole (Condylura cristata).

Sawyer E, Catania K J Comp Neurol. 2015; 524(5):917-29.

PMID: 26659700 PMC: 4731273. DOI: 10.1002/cne.23943.


References
1.
Carroll E . Quantitative light and electron microscopic analysis of cytochrome oxidase-rich zones in the striate cortex of the squirrel monkey. J Comp Neurol. 1984; 222(1):1-17. DOI: 10.1002/cne.902220102. View

2.
Wassle H, Grunert U, Rohrenbeck J, BOYCOTT B . Retinal ganglion cell density and cortical magnification factor in the primate. Vision Res. 1990; 30(11):1897-911. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(90)90166-i. View

3.
Ashwell K, Hardman C, Paxinos G . Cyto- and chemoarchitecture of the sensory trigeminal nuclei of the echidna, platypus and rat. J Chem Neuroanat. 2005; 31(2):81-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2005.08.007. View

4.
Silveira L, Picanco-Diniz C, SAMPAIO L, Oswaldo-Cruz E . Retinal ganglion cell distribution in the cebus monkey: a comparison with the cortical magnification factors. Vision Res. 1989; 29(11):1471-83. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90131-4. View

5.
Malpeli J, Baker F . The representation of the visual field in the lateral geniculate nucleus of Macaca mulatta. J Comp Neurol. 1975; 161(4):569-94. DOI: 10.1002/cne.901610407. View