» Articles » PMID: 21809111

A Systematic Review of the Accuracy and Utility of Peritoneal Cytology in Patients with Gastric Cancer

Overview
Journal Gastric Cancer
Date 2011 Aug 3
PMID 21809111
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is lack of uniformity in the utilization of peritoneal cytology in gastric cancer management. The identification of intraperitoneal free cancer cells (IFCCs) is believed to confer poor prognosis. However, while some of these patients are palliated, others may undergo more aggressive therapies. In this review, we aimed to identify and synthesize findings on the use of peritoneal cytology in predicting peritoneal recurrence and overall survival in curative gastric cancer patients.

Methods: Electronic literature searches were conducted using Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 2009. We determined the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of peritoneal cytology in predicting peritoneal recurrence based on four techniques-conventional cytology, immunoassay, immunohistochemistry, and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Recurrence rates and overall survival rates for curative patients were determined, based on positivity or negativity for IFCCs.

Results: Twenty-eight articles were included. All four techniques showed wide variations in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in predicting peritoneal recurrence. Recurrence rates for patients positive for IFCCs ranged from 11.1 to 100%, while those negative for IFCCs had recurrence rates of 0-51%. Overall survival was significantly reduced for patients with positive IFCCs. Short follow-up periods and possible duplication of results may limit result interpretation.

Conclusion: The presence of IFCCs appears to increase the risk of peritoneal recurrence and is associated with worse overall survival in gastric cancer patients. Further incorporation of peritoneal cytology in clinical decision-making in gastric cancer depends on the development of a consistently accurate and rapid IFCC detection method.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Peritoneal Cytology Results Before and After Resection in Gastric Cancer Patients.

Hacioglu D, Guler E, Gumus T, Ersin S, Firat O, Ozgur Sezer T Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e65832.

PMID: 39219913 PMC: 11363473. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65832.


The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2023.

Wang F, Zhang X, Tang L, Wu Q, Cai M, Li Y Cancer Commun (Lond). 2023; 44(1):127-172.

PMID: 38160327 PMC: 10794017. DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12516.


Idiopathic Chronic Pancreatitis Presenting as Hemorrhagic Ascites: A Case Report.

Salih N, Amin U, Hamza K, Ghani N, Ali S, Sarfaraz H Cureus. 2023; 15(9):e45303.

PMID: 37846267 PMC: 10576976. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45303.


The prognostic impact of peritoneal tumour DNA in gastrointestinal and gynaecological malignancies: a systematic review.

Allan Z, Witts S, Tie J, Tebbutt N, Clemons N, Liu D Br J Cancer. 2023; 129(11):1717-1726.

PMID: 37700064 PMC: 10667497. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02424-6.


A prospective Canadian gastroesophageal cancer database: What have we learned?.

Purich K, Skubleny D, Ghosh S, Bedard E, Stewart K, Johnson S Can J Surg. 2023; 66(4):E422-E431.

PMID: 37553256 PMC: 10414783. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.005122.