» Articles » PMID: 21808191

Role of Training Dose in Drug Discrimination: a Review

Overview
Journal Behav Pharmacol
Date 2011 Aug 3
PMID 21808191
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Drug discrimination has been an important technique in behavioural pharmacology for at least 40 years. The characteristics of drug-produced discriminative stimuli are influenced by behavioural and pharmacological variables, including the doses used to establish discriminations. This review covers studies on the effects of varying the training dose of a drug in a search for general principles that are applicable across different drug classes and methodological approaches. With respect to quantitative changes, relationships between training dose and the rate of acquisition or magnitude of stimulus control were found for most drug classes. Acquisition accelerated with dose up to a point beyond which drug-induced impairments of performance had a deleterious impact. Sensitivity to the training drug as measured by ED(50) values typically increased when the training dose was reduced. Qualitative changes were more complex and appeared to fall into three categories: (a) changes in profiles of generalization between partial and full agonists; (b) reduced specificity of some discriminations at small training doses; and (c) changes in the relative salience of actions mediated through different neurotransmitter systems or from central and peripheral sites. Three-lever discrimination procedures incorporating 'drug versus drug' or 'dose versus dose' contingencies enabled detection of more subtle differences than the simple 'drug versus no drug' approach when applied to the opioid, hallucinogen and barbiturate classes of drugs. These conclusions have implications for the interpretation of data from studies that use either within-subject or between-subject designs for studying the discriminative stimulus effects of drugs.

Citing Articles

Pulsed nicotine infusions as a model for smoking: validating a tool to explore nicotine thresholds in humans.

Parida S, MacLean R, Gueorguieva R, Sofuoglu M Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2024; 241(9):1915-1922.

PMID: 38970644 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-024-06609-6.


1-(2,5-Dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOI): From an Obscure to Pivotal Member of the DOX Family of Serotonergic Psychedelic Agents - A Review.

Glennon R, Dukat M ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2024; 7(6):1722-1745.

PMID: 38898956 PMC: 11184610. DOI: 10.1021/acsptsci.4c00157.


mGlu and mGlu receptor negative allosteric modulators attenuate the interoceptive effects of alcohol in male and female rats.

Tyler R, Van Voorhies K, Blough B, Landavazo A, Besheer J Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2024; 239():173767.

PMID: 38608960 PMC: 11090252. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173767.


Assessment of Abuse-Related Discriminative Stimulus Effects of Nicotine Aerosol in Rodents.

Alkhlaif Y, Shelton K J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2023; 385(3):171-179.

PMID: 36918277 PMC: 10201579. DOI: 10.1124/jpet.122.001520.


Predator odor (TMT) exposure potentiates interoceptive sensitivity to alcohol and increases GABAergic gene expression in the anterior insular cortex and nucleus accumbens in male rats.

Tyler R, Bluitt M, Van Voorhies K, Ornelas L, Weinberg B, Besheer J Alcohol. 2022; 104:1-11.

PMID: 36150613 PMC: 9733390. DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2022.07.002.


References
1.
Gauvin D, Young A . Evidence for perceptual masking of the discriminative morphine stimulus. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1989; 98(2):212-21. DOI: 10.1007/BF00444694. View

2.
Vanecek S, Young A . Pharmacological characterization of an operant discrimination among two doses of morphine and saline in pigeons. Behav Pharmacol. 1995; 6(7):669-681. View

3.
Koek W, Slangen J . The role of fentanyl training dose and of the alternative stimulus condition in drug generalization. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1982; 76(2):149-56. DOI: 10.1007/BF00435269. View

4.
Jarbe T, Lamb R, Makriyannis A, Lin S, Goutopoulos A . Delta9-THC training dose as a determinant for (R)-methanandamide generalization in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999; 140(4):519-22. DOI: 10.1007/s002130050797. View

5.
Colpaert F, NIEMEGEERS C, Janssen P . Theoretical and methodological considerations on drug discrimination learning. Psychopharmacologia. 1976; 46(2):169-77. DOI: 10.1007/BF00421388. View