» Articles » PMID: 21808072

Widespread Use of Pure and Impure Placebo Interventions by GPs in Germany

Overview
Journal Fam Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 2011 Aug 3
PMID 21808072
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To collect data on the use of placebo interventions by GPs in Germany.

Methods: A questionnaire was mailed to 400 randomly selected GPs in Bavaria. Non-responders were reminded by telephone after 4 weeks and were given a second copy of the questionnaire after a further 3 weeks.

Results: In all, 208 completed questionnaires were returned. The majority of GPs (88%) have used a placebo at least once in their practice; 45% have used pure placebos, such as saline injections and sugar pills, at least once last year; the median frequency of use was 5 [interquartile range (IQR), 2-10]. The use of impure placebos during the past year was more common: 76% of GPs have used impure placebos, i.e. medical interventions that have pharmacological or physical activity but have no intrinsic effect (e.g. pharmacological or physical action) on the patient's disease or its symptoms, with a median frequency of 20 times per year (IQR, 10-50). The main reason for the use of placebo was a possible psychological effect, followed by the expectation of patients to receive a treatment. For the majority of GPs placebo interventions were ethically justified if they were used for a possible psychological effect.

Conclusions: Placebo interventions are a widely accepted part of medical treatment in German general practices and are used primarily for their psychological effects. Impure placebos are used much more frequently than pure placebos.

Citing Articles

Open-Label Placebo Administration Decreases Pain in Elderly Patients With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis - A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Olliges E, Stroppe S, Haile A, Reiss F, Malhis M, Funke S Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:853497.

PMID: 35599777 PMC: 9122028. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.853497.


Integrating Placebo Effects in General Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey to Investigate Perspectives From Health Care Professionals in the Netherlands.

Smits R, Veldhuijzen D, van Middendorp H, van der Heijden M, Dijk M, Evers A Front Psychiatry. 2022; 12:768135.

PMID: 35095592 PMC: 8790122. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.768135.


Does Health Literacy Make a Difference? Comparing the Effect of Conventional Medicine Versus Homeopathic Prescribing on Treatment Credibility and Expectancy.

Wilhelm M, Euteneuer F Front Psychol. 2021; 12:581255.

PMID: 34140910 PMC: 8204743. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.581255.


Effects of a probiotic treatment () and open-label placebo on symptoms of allergic rhinitis: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Schaefer M, Enck P BMJ Open. 2019; 9(10):e031339.

PMID: 31662387 PMC: 6830672. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031339.


On the edges of medicine - a qualitative study on the function of complementary, alternative, and non-specific therapies in handling therapeutically indeterminate situations.

Ostermaier A, Barth N, Schneider A, Linde K BMC Fam Pract. 2019; 20(1):55.

PMID: 31014266 PMC: 6480714. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-019-0945-4.